Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,543 posts)
1. Don't know.
Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:52 PM
Apr 2012

I'd agree with the former; most middle-management, white-collar folk that are in a position to commit anything but trivial financial crimes (e.g. taking money from the office supplies slush fund for a burger) are going to be whites, 30 to 65 years old.

But the second I'd hedge on. I'd say that a wildly disproportionate number of violent street crimes are committed by blacks aged 16-25 for a number of reasons (some of which would be acceptable here, some of which wouldn't be). Whether or not that's a majority of them is committed by black adolescent males is a fact that can be tracked down.

I suspect it's rather like the welfare numbers. No, the majority of welfare recipients aren't black. The numbers range from around 42-48%, depending on the year. 50.1% would be a majority. On the other hand, blacks are 12-13% of the population so they're greatly overrepresented in the stats.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't know. Igel Apr 2012 #1
How about: bemildred Apr 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we agree with both pa...»Reply #1