General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some Defend-President-Obama-no-matter-what-folks here will do anything to divert, [View all]Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's obviously a big subject to get too specific here but there are many examples of how this "reality-based" claim by people who object to "hyperbolie" has been as much an impediment to progress as the reactionary GOP.
It's not a matter of seeking unrealistic "purist" goals. The first step has always been to try and at least stop the Democratic Party from backsliding from its claimed role as the party that is the balancing force to GOP conservatism.
One example -- When the financial sector was "modernized" through deregulation in the 90's, a lot of people criticized it and tried to point out how destructive that could be to the economy and to te interests of the majority -- and how it would lead to abuses and excessive concentration into a small handful of Super Bank Monopolies.
They were not pushing for some fantasy -- Just trying to make sure that any "modernizations" were balanced and were not being done totally to advance the interests of the Super Banks at the expense of the economy and the majority of the population.
But the "realists" and "adults" used your same dismissive tone, and said that we were over-reacting and being "unrealistic." Well, down the line, those warnings were proven true.
Maybe you are projecting your own frustrations at what you perceive to be a totally un-reformable system. But I don't agree with overcompensating for that by insulting and trying to marginalize people who still believe that actual reform and change for the better are possible.