Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Paladin

(32,354 posts)
84. Wayne LaPierre, kindly stay the fuck out of my doctor's office.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 10:57 AM
Jul 2014

"Irrelevant private matters," my ass.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Florida Man strikes again. onehandle Jul 2014 #1
i agree with you samsingh Jul 2014 #5
+1. There are a few who just can't accept that fact, but not many. n/t Hoyt Jul 2014 #28
Ban all guns PowerToThePeople Jul 2014 #2
given the position of gun lovers, this is the only position that makes sense to me samsingh Jul 2014 #4
Think you have the votes to accomplish that? nt. IronGate Jul 2014 #7
Gun Ownership Conclusively linked to Male Impotence and Penile Necrosis onehandle Jul 2014 #12
Yeah, IronGate Jul 2014 #13
That lot find adolescent jokes a balm for political inefficacy friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #23
And why do you think that is? rock Jul 2014 #38
Gee, I don't know. IronGate Jul 2014 #39
It's obvious rock Jul 2014 #40
Non answer. IronGate Jul 2014 #44
Well let me spell it out for you rock Jul 2014 #45
What obviousness of comparison? IronGate Jul 2014 #46
OK since you asked so nicely rock Jul 2014 #47
So, you're a head shrink? IronGate Jul 2014 #48
Don't need to be rock Jul 2014 #50
"Remember I said it's obvious." Declaring it 'obvious' doesn't make it so friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #67
Well, I guess I can try to explain this to you for what it's worth rock Jul 2014 #70
Insults to go with your pseudo-Freudian imagery? Feh. friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #75
OK you got me rock Jul 2014 #76
wouldn't gun servant be an appropriate description samsingh Jul 2014 #73
I don't object rock Jul 2014 #74
others to consider samsingh Jul 2014 #85
You almost can't go wrong rock Jul 2014 #86
agreed samsingh Jul 2014 #87
Hilarious! badtoworse Jul 2014 #41
Do women who own guns have issues with their nipples getting hard? snooper2 Jul 2014 #56
nope samsingh Jul 2014 #29
Just in: Carrying guns linked to cunnilingus. Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #78
DUzy. IronGate Jul 2014 #82
Thanks. When the opportunity arises. Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #88
All it will take is 2/3 of the states agreeing to repeal the 2A. IronGate Jul 2014 #6
Ban all gun nuts onehandle Jul 2014 #8
How? nt. IronGate Jul 2014 #10
Ban teh Gunz111!1 aikoaiko Jul 2014 #16
Absolutely! mwrguy Jul 2014 #42
So how would you do it, IronGate Jul 2014 #49
It won't be easy, but it's not impossible. mwrguy Jul 2014 #65
And repealing the second amendment doesn't make the right go away. X_Digger Jul 2014 #79
OK SCOTUS. You love the 1A so much? Prove it. Loudly Jul 2014 #3
Civil rights sometimes conflict with each other. In this case, the right to privacy prevailed. badtoworse Jul 2014 #9
Scalia says there is no right to privacy in the Constitution. nt flamin lib Jul 2014 #15
So? badtoworse Jul 2014 #25
So, if it goes to SCOTUS two votes will go against privacy flamin lib Jul 2014 #53
As a technical point, you may be right,... badtoworse Jul 2014 #60
I'll say. The so-called RKBA conflicts with EVERYTHING! Loudly Jul 2014 #52
Do some research so you don't embarrass yourself further. badtoworse Jul 2014 #61
Hey, I listen to right wing loudmouth Mark Levin. He states very emphatically Loudly Jul 2014 #63
I see the problem. Instead of listening to Levin... badtoworse Jul 2014 #64
There can be no "right" to the means of conveniently depriving others of all their genuine rights. Loudly Jul 2014 #66
LOL. You must do lots of pandering. badtoworse Jul 2014 #68
No, I don't suffer fools gladly. Loudly Jul 2014 #69
Sometimes, I do. badtoworse Jul 2014 #71
So obsolete that the battle of athens never happened. beevul Jul 2014 #72
'irrelevant'? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #11
False equivalence pipoman Jul 2014 #17
And that's based on your vast understanding of public health, then, Dr? nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #20
based on knowing the difference between pipoman Jul 2014 #22
Maybe you might want to spend a little time on reading about Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #26
Funny, I've had many doctors and not one has pipoman Jul 2014 #33
I've never had one suggest that either. badtoworse Jul 2014 #36
Never had these questions asked. Hangingon Jul 2014 #62
Do you know doctors who would dismiss patients for saying they would not like to disclose... aikoaiko Jul 2014 #19
'no apparent health threat'? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #21
Fabricated statistics aside, are you proclaiming a 'comic' being something more? pipoman Jul 2014 #24
Ah, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #31
So then you will hang onto the truth if someone posts NRA stats, eh? pipoman Jul 2014 #35
There are lots of dangers in the home. aikoaiko Jul 2014 #27
exactly samsingh Jul 2014 #30
+1 Zenlitened Jul 2014 #37
It's irrelevant to the doctor's advice. X_Digger Jul 2014 #81
No reason at all for Doctors to be concerned ... GeorgeGist Jul 2014 #14
True or not (and likely not), it's still none of their business. badtoworse Jul 2014 #34
good one marions ghost Jul 2014 #83
Doctors can still hand out information on baby proofing homes from any danger aikoaiko Jul 2014 #18
As a physician I would have no problem asking a patient about this...... Swede Atlanta Jul 2014 #32
Therein is the issue pipoman Jul 2014 #43
Allowing the patient to not answer without dismissing ten from your care makes you a good doctor aikoaiko Jul 2014 #51
"may be contributing..." So, you have a standard. Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #80
This case, in addition to the lobbying that went on to deny funding to the CDC from researching gun LanternWaste Jul 2014 #54
This case didn't have anything to do with research or data. aikoaiko Jul 2014 #55
Right. It had to do with doctors asking patients questions related to gun ownership, yes? LanternWaste Jul 2014 #57
Yes, in order to prevent doctors from denying medical services aikoaiko Jul 2014 #58
That's precisely how I read it. But thanks for the relevance...? LanternWaste Jul 2014 #59
Conservatives rail against government interference in dr & patient relationship gerogie2 Jul 2014 #77
That's not quite accurate. The law allowed such questions is medically necessary or for safety. aikoaiko Jul 2014 #89
Wayne LaPierre, kindly stay the fuck out of my doctor's office. Paladin Jul 2014 #84
Sounds like you are unfamiliar with the history of this law. ManiacJoe Jul 2014 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeal court upholds 'doc...»Reply #84