Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The IRS Says It Will Finally Enforce the Rules Barring Pastors Endorsing Candidates from the Pulpit [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)95. Got any good videos of them supporting candidates, etc? It will make the job easier if you do. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The IRS Says It Will Finally Enforce the Rules Barring Pastors Endorsing Candidates from the Pulpit [View all]
riqster
Jul 2014
OP
Right, lol? I would have taken a shower, but there was a vacancy in the position.
closeupready
Jul 2014
#25
the pastor can always lay in on thick when introducing the lay person who will endorse a candidate.
unblock
Jul 2014
#128
I live in the PNW and saw businesses posting signs saying voters would go to hell voting for Gore...
freshwest
Jul 2014
#41
'Twas ever thus. Rules and rule-breakers are always playing their cat-and-mouse games.
riqster
Jul 2014
#31
Because the IRS has almost never enforced this bit of tax law, Repub house or not.
riqster
Jul 2014
#51
And enforcement would likely be found unConstitutional by any American court of any era.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#58
Possibly. Or the court could issue a very narrow ruling about political pulpit speech.
riqster
Jul 2014
#62
The theater is a for profit business. Charities are not. (or not supposed to be) nt
napi21
Jul 2014
#88
Nope. Different parties involved. The exemption is based on an assumption of charitable activities.
riqster
Jul 2014
#84
And a lawsuit to say that this is restricting free speech is already in the wings, I would bet.
djean111
Jul 2014
#54
It's not free. They are receiving compensation for not politicizing sermons.
grahamhgreen
Jul 2014
#60
I once dated a Brit, and she wanted to attend a tent revival. Thought it would be fascinating.
riqster
Jul 2014
#78
Got any good videos of them supporting candidates, etc? It will make the job easier if you do. nt
Zorra
Jul 2014
#95
You have a problem with people investigating churches illegally supporting RW candidates? nt
Zorra
Jul 2014
#99
I'm still curious about why you seem to have such a problem with people investigating RW churches.
Zorra
Jul 2014
#105
I just found out the IRS might actually FINALLY start busting christo-fascist churches for
Zorra
Jul 2014
#113
Friggin A. Really? I thought they mentioned this years back, and I haven't seen it.
Xyzse
Jul 2014
#82
keep in mind that many African-American churches have played an important role on many election days
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2014
#92
Black churches know how to walk the line--it's the wingnut churches that have trouble in that regard
MADem
Jul 2014
#146
Are some pastors going to endorse liberal candidates? Is that why they're now enforcing
valerief
Jul 2014
#98
Yep. This is like having your 100-year old uncle finally admit he's an alcoholic.
riqster
Jul 2014
#123
I'm sorry but I'm not sure what your comment has to do with the OP. Please explain nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Jul 2014
#148