Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
62. If you did not mean that republican neocons were impeaching a Democratic neocon, I apologize. n/t
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 04:56 PM
Jul 2014

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is what happens when neocons are the powers behind both parties. Scuba Jul 2014 #1
I love seeing the correct answer in the first reply. Soylent Brice Jul 2014 #50
I agree. ;-l n/t ReRe Jul 2014 #92
No. You love seeing BULLSHIT in the first reply. Clinton being a neocon is irrelevant! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #116
ohai. Soylent Brice Jul 2014 #153
"Correct answer" implies fact. It is not a fact. It is a fallacy. A fallacy is a statement that lack Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #156
... Soylent Brice Jul 2014 #158
Meaning republicans would not have impeached Clinton if he were a "true liberal"? pampango Jul 2014 #53
That's certainly not my meaning. Since it's yours, how do you justify it? Scuba Jul 2014 #59
If you did not mean that republican neocons were impeaching a Democratic neocon, I apologize. n/t pampango Jul 2014 #62
That's exactly what I meant. The point was he was a Democrat; it didn't matter that he was a neocon. Scuba Jul 2014 #64
If republicans would impeach a Democrat whether he were a neocon or not, then pampango Jul 2014 #67
Pretty certain means Democrats *would* have impeached Bush if the Party were not run by neo-cons. ieoeja Jul 2014 #134
I always thought it was because he lied about lying to his wife or leftyladyfrommo Jul 2014 #66
No, he was charged with perjury, i.e., lying under oath in his grand jury testimony. Divernan Jul 2014 #85
wasnt he disbarred, too? Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #124
He was temporarily disbarred from the Supreme Court. He was never charged with perjury. ieoeja Jul 2014 #135
But what was he lying about? leftyladyfrommo Jul 2014 #131
That makes no sense. Look, I'm no fan of the Clintons, but if Bill Clinton is a neocon, and the Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #115
Don't Blame the Republicans! Chasstev365 Jul 2014 #122
Part of it is that a whole bunch of Dems such as Hillary and Kerry voted for the war (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #2
This. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #5
Bush's accomplices could have been gone after too. Louisiana1976 Jul 2014 #38
Accept that Bill is best buddies with the Bushes and it seems good friends with John McCain. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #117
Not sure what that has to do with my post in any way at all. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #126
Sure it does. He was slow to condemn the illegal invasion of Iraq because his wife Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #143
True, and Mr.Bill Jul 2014 #22
Oh boy, here we go again! George II Jul 2014 #23
I'm dumbfounded that people on 'our side' continue to perpetuate this falsehood ... brett_jv Jul 2014 #54
Did they really think Bush wasn't going to go to war????!!!!11111 bigwillq Jul 2014 #55
Anyone who was conscious laundry_queen Jul 2014 #57
Regardless, why represent it that way when discussing the subject on a liberal board? brett_jv Jul 2014 #70
Fair point. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #72
Doesn't change the fact that laundry_queen Jul 2014 #74
. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2014 #138
I used to think I was a republican... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #96
Ah. laundry_queen Jul 2014 #97
Yep, that is how I came up with the name... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2014 #148
BULLSHIT!!!!!! They voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq...something that Bush wanted and was Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #118
Been asking that for a couple years now. blm Jul 2014 #3
Not Me...It's Easy billhicks76 Jul 2014 #82
To a certain extent Cosmocat Jul 2014 #103
I've always been able to answer this. The American people place double standards on the parties. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #119
LOL - I said that facetiously. Of COURSE I KNOW why and how. ; ) blm Jul 2014 #144
Brilliantly said. Boomerproud Jul 2014 #151
If I remember right, Bill was impeached for the lies he told to a grand jury. FreedRadical Jul 2014 #4
It depends Pharaoh Jul 2014 #36
The words of the Articles of Impeachment ... oldhippie Jul 2014 #46
Yes. Lies about SEX. He lied to a grand jury about SEX. CHEATING ON HIS WIFE. calimary Jul 2014 #49
Super great post!! davekriss Jul 2014 #60
Don't hold back. Tell me what you think. FreedRadical Jul 2014 #123
except that he lied about sex Niceguy1 Jul 2014 #125
good post northoftheborder Jul 2014 #128
Obama's Community Chest whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #6
Do you want an honest answer, or do you just want to vent? brooklynite Jul 2014 #7
If I know he was lying...and you know he was lying...and he knows he was lying... world wide wally Jul 2014 #28
I DON'T know he was lying (I don't over-estimate his intelligence)... brooklynite Jul 2014 #29
He took an oath to uphold the office and to defend the Constitution world wide wally Jul 2014 #31
...and how did his actions in Iraq violate that pledge? brooklynite Jul 2014 #34
Do I really need to explain it to you? world wide wally Jul 2014 #90
Sorry, I don't subscribe to "we all know" as a legal doctrine... brooklynite Jul 2014 #102
You are absolutely right!! Had the majority of Dems in the House/Senate stood firm Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #157
The jury isn't selected from 90% of the rest of the world... Hippo_Tron Jul 2014 #105
The difference is that Democrats view impeachment as a serious process, hedgehog Jul 2014 #8
Bingo. savalez Jul 2014 #21
You can also add: AngryDem001 Jul 2014 #24
Also, they never got over Nixon's impeachment based on journalists' uncovering a coverup. SleeplessinSoCal Jul 2014 #37
excellent post Cosmocat Jul 2014 #106
Very good points - I think the key is that they really believed that the Democratic Party was hedgehog Jul 2014 #142
They can believe all they want that Daley stole the 1960 election. HubertHeaver Jul 2014 #149
Romney's "47%" leak is paramount to everything SleeplessinSoCal Jul 2014 #150
This^ ^ ^ Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2014 #51
WINNER! Cosmocat Jul 2014 #104
How dare you not use Clinton's impeachment to trash Democrats!!!1! tridim Jul 2014 #110
Ask the leadership of the democratic party. JVS Jul 2014 #9
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Jul 2014 #61
I think that they investigated him for that but I think the impeachment was based on his lying about jwirr Jul 2014 #10
Too many Democratic Pols were collaborators in Bush's wars. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #11
Not only that, Dems remembered the backlash loyalsister Jul 2014 #56
Lopsided power base. Baitball Blogger Jul 2014 #12
But our powder is still dry. postulater Jul 2014 #13
"There's something really fucked up about all of this." KansDem Jul 2014 #14
True. Louisiana1976 Jul 2014 #39
I have never read an elected Republican leader calling for impeachment. former9thward Jul 2014 #15
Are you fricking kiddinng me? Cosmocat Jul 2014 #107
Technically... Spider Jerusalem Jul 2014 #16
Why was Clinton asked under oath if he was cheating on his wife? I mean, that should be Louisiana1976 Jul 2014 #40
Well... Spider Jerusalem Jul 2014 #43
It wasn't just Lewinsky loyalsister Jul 2014 #63
I've been making the same point about Clinton and Bush for years. Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2014 #17
It was the lying under oath that got him in trouble hack89 Jul 2014 #18
Yep. He shouldn't have denied it. The story would have gone away after a couple of weeks. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #20
We have a winner. ^ world wide wally Jul 2014 #30
LOL - if you really believe that ... BlueMTexpat Jul 2014 #112
Not saying he should have been impeached hack89 Jul 2014 #113
One thing: he was never, ever accused of lying under oath by any court of law. ieoeja Jul 2014 #136
ya think? Voice for Peace Jul 2014 #19
+1000 C Moon Jul 2014 #25
The DEMS did not want to hold Bush Co. accountable. bigwillq Jul 2014 #26
Yep. "Impeachment is off the table." We're "looking forward..." polichick Jul 2014 #27
Because Democrats are afraid to impeach war criminals, they told us that it would 'look political'. sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #32
+ 1000 nt raouldukelives Jul 2014 #88
Big reason Dubya wasn't impeached -- Dick Cheney Shoonra Jul 2014 #33
Wasn't he also the deciding vote in the Senate? GoCubsGo Jul 2014 #77
Conviction would have required 67 votes, not 51. n/t ColesCountyDem Jul 2014 #98
So, in other words... GoCubsGo Jul 2014 #132
Precisely. ColesCountyDem Jul 2014 #145
If Cheney saw a chance JoeyT Jul 2014 #99
Republicans want to impeach onecaliberal Jul 2014 #35
Two reasons: 1) abstract vs. concrete and 2) the corporate media RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #41
Good analysis. maddiemom Jul 2014 #121
What is really fucked up about all this is President Obama's failure to prosecute Bush Enthusiast Jul 2014 #42
I agree. If the right wants to impeach Obama, it should be for that. polichick Jul 2014 #58
Absolute bullshit Cosmocat Jul 2014 #108
You are entitled to your opinion. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #130
Ask Nancy Pelosi. Fuddnik Jul 2014 #44
And the anthrax mail finally was, too. nt valerief Jul 2014 #48
Bush (or Cheney and his cronies, really) managed to create a simulacrum of legality around Aristus Jul 2014 #45
Clinton's cheating didn't make rich people richer. Bush's war did. nt valerief Jul 2014 #47
Your typical con is jealous that Clinton got so much you know what... randys1 Jul 2014 #52
Clinton should not have been impeached, Progressive dog Jul 2014 #65
The MIC makes more money when the republicans are in power. Initech Jul 2014 #68
Clinton was impeached because of hubris SoCalDem Jul 2014 #69
"We have to look forward" Mnpaul Jul 2014 #73
I think we have to let go of this already. Let's move on. We"ve said our arguments CTyankee Jul 2014 #71
I'm pretty sure a call to "impeach" Obama jimlup Jul 2014 #75
I think the Dems were afraid a Bush impeachment would backfire on them, too. GoCubsGo Jul 2014 #76
Yeah and I also think that it would wake-up Obama's base /nt jimlup Jul 2014 #78
The dc dems are the "good cop" in the charade we pay to watch Doctor_J Jul 2014 #79
What is really fucked up about all this is how the right-wing meme is thrust upon us incessantly by indepat Jul 2014 #80
Sex:bad - Saving lives:bad - War:good - Killing:good Kablooie Jul 2014 #81
They thought we wouldn' notice is all I could figure...nt fadedrose Jul 2014 #83
Well, there's two parts to that Prophet 451 Jul 2014 #84
Yeah that is how fucked up everything really is. Rex Jul 2014 #86
IOKIYAR Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #87
Everything's OK ... if you're a Republican !!! blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #89
Of course there is something fucked up about all this. MADem Jul 2014 #91
Are we sure he lied? greymattermom Jul 2014 #93
The only impeachable crime is being a Democrat jmowreader Jul 2014 #94
K&R DeSwiss Jul 2014 #95
I got told by right wingers at the time: Buddha2B Jul 2014 #100
YEP Cosmocat Jul 2014 #109
Bill Clinton got impeached customerserviceguy Jul 2014 #101
Duplicity Is An Ugly Trait Mastered By The Right cantbeserious Jul 2014 #111
AND...the American people will make sure it happens by handing the Senate over to Republicans. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2014 #114
threat if impeachment is part of the right wing playbook now rurallib Jul 2014 #120
because Dems aren't extremists and GOP is. librechik Jul 2014 #127
He was impeached for being a Democratic President CanonRay Jul 2014 #129
The standard was set with Clinton, and impeachment is something one party will "clamor" for hughee99 Jul 2014 #133
stupid treacherous repugs samsingh Jul 2014 #137
Which one makes rich white men richer? efhmc Jul 2014 #139
According to Buddhism, this is the predicted Age of Mappo, or Age of Confusion, when everything is DesertDiamond Jul 2014 #140
This is a great question for Nancy Pelosi... radhika Jul 2014 #141
Bush and Cheney were too smart to agree to deposition under oath. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #146
No, they were simply more brazen. WinkyDink Jul 2014 #155
He was impeached for lying, not enjoying a WH hummer. NM_Birder Jul 2014 #147
IIRC, Pelosi took impeachement off the table; and Obama said he was merrily Jul 2014 #152
Because Republicans like to put things on the table. WinkyDink Jul 2014 #154
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How can it be that Bill C...»Reply #62