Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
83. You didn't answer the question... do you disagree with the quotes?
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 09:23 PM
Jul 2014

And just because the group has it's SOP, that doesn't negate that it is closed minded and refuses to deal with facts. In fact, it's pretty much stating it right there. And it would be one thing if that was confined to the group, but it isn't. There are plenty who, rather than discuss an issue, simply attempt to smear anyone who dares speak out against the current administration no matter what group it is posted in.

I got banned for practically nothing. I didn't even know I was posting to the group. Not only that, I got banned with no warning. It's a shitty group that gets run shittily.

Your past paragraph is so far from reality it's sad that you think it is true. If it were true you wouldn't see so many comments from other DUers about the "BOGGERS". And as to your last sentence, the result was the result of people speaking out. The Summers trial balloon failed because so many people spoke out against it. Chained CPI failed because so many people spoke out against it. That's the point of democracy, people get to criticize the govt and speak out and hopefully affect policy. If we were never to criticize or speak out it would not be a democracy. Governed by the consent of the governed means something.

And your comment about thread after thread condemning the president is telling. You are more worried that he is being criticized than you are about the bad policy he pursues. And that right there is the crux of the problem. I truly hope one day you will see that you are not doing yourself or our country any favors by attempting to disallow any and all criticism of the administration. I really do.

The quotes in my sig are extremely important. The fact that you took them as directed at you/the BOG speaks volumes. Perhaps you should let them sink in. The country depends on it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Using Ralph Nader as an example for anything having to do MineralMan Jul 2014 #1
Character assassination - what people use when they don't like the truth. polichick Jul 2014 #2
Clearly, I disagree with you. MineralMan Jul 2014 #5
And I have to disagree with you. I think Nader is right. A Simple Game Jul 2014 #34
But pretending he isn't exempts our party... Orsino Jul 2014 #67
And extremely disturbing how often it happens on a site like DU. cui bono Jul 2014 #12
Love your quotes! polichick Jul 2014 #13
Edited since my comment was causing more divisiveness. cui bono Jul 2014 #17
LOL~ A reply from the BOG sheshe2 Jul 2014 #45
What does that mean? That you don't agree with the quotes in my sig? cui bono Jul 2014 #59
Ah cui.... sheshe2 Jul 2014 #63
It's not poking fun. It's a very serious matter. I wish you would see that one day. cui bono Jul 2014 #68
I think your reply in #17 is telling in that it shows the condescending nature you take davidpdx Jul 2014 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author cui bono Jul 2014 #79
I wish what you said were true. Then it wouldn't make my sig so important. However, the fact cui bono Jul 2014 #81
I don't support people shutting down conversations or criticism davidpdx Jul 2014 #84
I think you're right actually. I did not need to make that comment seeing as how it is being cui bono Jul 2014 #85
Yes, it is poking fun. sheshe2 Jul 2014 #80
You didn't answer the question... do you disagree with the quotes? cui bono Jul 2014 #83
I edited my initial comment since it was causing divisiveness. cui bono Jul 2014 #86
+1 L0oniX Jul 2014 #47
For you LOonix~ sheshe2 Jul 2014 #57
So now you're saying that character assassination is fine? cui bono Jul 2014 #69
Uuuum, character assassination? sheshe2 Jul 2014 #73
Um... read the subthread. That's what L0onix was agreeing was a problem on DU. cui bono Jul 2014 #74
I agree with you. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #24
Warren is the only remotely populist pscot Jul 2014 #43
If Democrats embraced populism Enthusiast Jul 2014 #64
+1 L0oniX Jul 2014 #46
+100 nt Mojorabbit Jul 2014 #53
Nader hatred is stupidity at its finest noiretextatique Jul 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #30
You do know there was life in America pscot Jul 2014 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #60
Gore ran a crappy campaign, selected an asshole as running mate, distanced himself from a popular tularetom Jul 2014 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #58
Why is it that you choose to put Nader at fault if Gore is also to blame? cui bono Jul 2014 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #71
To undercut the Dems or to fight for the people? cui bono Jul 2014 #72
+1000 noiretextatique Aug 2014 #87
Classic denial. Chronically late people are forever blaming the traffic RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #25
Well said. n/t cui bono Jul 2014 #75
Are you able to elucidate WHY using Nader as an example is "lame"? DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2014 #82
Fuck Ralph Nader...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #3
As worthless as the first time whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #6
..... closeupready Jul 2014 #7
yeah...let's just fuck all the consumer protections noiretextatique Jul 2014 #19
Nader haters may just not know (not being sarcastic) how important he is to history! randys1 Jul 2014 #26
Apparently it's not only Republicans who are proud of ignorance. polichick Jul 2014 #23
+1 L0oniX Jul 2014 #48
And Sid once more contributes what he can to the conversation. A Simple Game Jul 2014 #35
LMFAO L0oniX Jul 2014 #49
And fuck the idea of the Democratic Party as "his" party treestar Aug 2014 #88
"The party has lost its soul" is a polite way to say it... polichick Jul 2014 #4
+100000 woo me with science Jul 2014 #41
That's what Hillary represents to me - "The party has lost its soul" L0oniX Jul 2014 #50
Excellent and true article at the link Carolina Jul 2014 #8
The part I found even more offensive was this. FreedRadical Jul 2014 #9
The purpose of the jury system is not to suppress things you disagree with. former9thward Jul 2014 #10
You can be sure of that, absoLUTELY randys1 Jul 2014 #27
"from the radical left" lol polichick Jul 2014 #11
Yea that got me too. L0oniX Jul 2014 #55
"The jury will probably rule against me, but at least I'm standing up for what I believe." cui bono Jul 2014 #15
To answer your question. FreedRadical Jul 2014 #20
I couldn't disagree with you more. You are simply showing how closed minded you are when you say cui bono Jul 2014 #22
It is an appeal to emotion. zeemike Jul 2014 #28
Yes, and also an emotional reaction rather than an intellectual one. cui bono Jul 2014 #39
Spot on. woo me with science Jul 2014 #40
Wow ...you call a DU member an "asshole" and the jury doesn't hide. Wow. L0oniX Jul 2014 #52
Congratulations, the first liberal bashing post I have read today, thanks for the hate. A Simple Game Jul 2014 #37
Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT - Thanks much to the good jury participants. L0oniX Jul 2014 #51
Oh no! not the LEFT?! Heavens to betsy, to the bomb shelters! Scootaloo Jul 2014 #76
du rec. xchrom Jul 2014 #14
Somebody mentioned Ralph Nader... Hotler Jul 2014 #16
Take a number. calimary Jul 2014 #38
Guaranteed to obliviate LWolf Jul 2014 #42
The George W. Bush haters seem to hate Ralph more than Bush. L0oniX Jul 2014 #54
Easier than addressing the substance of the OP. n/t Orsino Jul 2014 #66
I'd heard this said by a Republican against his own party Sheepshank Jul 2014 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #31
The Republican Party HAS lost its soul. Your corrosive false equivalency doesn't help RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #33
Good point davidpdx Jul 2014 #77
DU rec. zeemike Jul 2014 #29
"Inaction from Democrats ... has given populism to Republicans and their further-right colleagues." Scuba Jul 2014 #32
Populism is very scary for the PTB RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #36
I like his ideas about a populist uprising. Bill Curry appears to agree with him that the time may sabrina 1 Jul 2014 #61
Say what? Tea party has railed “loudest against big banks and corporate corruption.” lunasun Jul 2014 #62
The teahadists have done NOTHING about big banks and corruption n2doc Jul 2014 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»‘My Party Has Lost Its So...»Reply #83