Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What would it take for the GOP to lose the House? [View all]TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)42. Yep, in an organized fashion. Too willy nilly and safe districts become dicey and no impact is made
The Senate is easier, a few million in the right states maybe even just hundreds of thousands could make TeaPubliKlan control nearly impossible.
Take the Dakotas, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Utah off the table and the path becomes very tough. They make too much hay off of a bunch of states with minimal population.
This would also force some general moderation as effort would have to be put into saner states instead of a bunch of gimmies that are loon tolerant.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you believe we actually have an advantage in those gerrymandered districts though?
TheKentuckian
Jul 2014
#37
Yep, in an organized fashion. Too willy nilly and safe districts become dicey and no impact is made
TheKentuckian
Jul 2014
#42