Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drm604

(16,230 posts)
5. Where did you get the idea that no energy was applied to the "box"?
Fri Aug 1, 2014, 05:11 AM
Aug 2014

From the PDF you linked to:

Approximately 30-50 micro-Newtons of
thrust were recorded from an
electric propulsion test article
consisting primarily of a radio frequency (RF) reson
ant cavity excited at approximately 935 megahertz.

They refer to is as "electric propulsion" implying that electricity was involved. Radio frequency energy was applied, which means that energy was applied.

Reactionless electric propulsion would be a major breakthrough, but it wouldn't be free propulsion. You'd still need an energy supply of some kind.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From NASA: Potentially, A...»Reply #5