There is no need for anyone to fly off the handle, but is HRC part

[MADem]

99. I vote for "...mislead people on purpose." The question is ... WHY?

Are they actively pushing to marginalize this potential candidate, or are they trying to shave her margins to make it/fake it to appear to be more of a horserace?

How can they generate audience share if there isn't any drama? (They might try mature analysis and INFORMED commentary--but maybe that costs too much? Listening to bloviating bullshit from the likes of that scurrilous product of nepotism, Luke the Puke Russert, is about as good as they can do, I fear.)

Of course, this is turning a lot of people (like me) off. And that causes a lot of people (like me) to vote with their remote. And all of the newschannels are feeling the pain--people are getting sick of uninformed assholes with big heads yammering and yammering, and saying little to nothing--and that is what a lot of those stations are churning out. I'd rather read the papers and watch reality (gag) TV!

The bottom line is, as you have so ably reported, any media journalist who reports that HRC was a "member" of this group is not telling the truth. They are inventing facts to suit an agenda, and they really should be ashamed of themselves.