Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(13,218 posts)

2. I take it you think these reports are from scientists and that is why you are confused?

Mon Aug 4, 2014, 10:53 AM

Aug 2014

Why do you think that? (if you do)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Iron Dome Question [View all] DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2014 OP

I should verify it myself DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2014 #3

Good advice rock Aug 2014 #5

Depends how one defines "effective" oberliner Aug 2014 #4

"Designed to destroy only a small percentage of rockets" tkmorris Aug 2014 #6

A lot of folks share your point of view oberliner Aug 2014 #8

I'm confused DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2014 #14

Good question oberliner Aug 2014 #17

The claim it's ineffective because it intercepts so few rockets oberliner Aug 2014 #16

That argument makes zero sense joeglow3 Aug 2014 #19

I'm sure someone could make the argument much better than I could oberliner Aug 2014 #20

iron dome enid602 Aug 2014 #10

If you think Israel's actions in Gaza were excessive hack89 Aug 2014 #13

From Wikipedia oberliner Aug 2014 #9

It can be 100 percent effective bigwillq Aug 2014 #11

Since it is completely defensive YarnAddict Aug 2014 #18

File under: Lies, damned lies and statistics. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #12

If Iron Dome is as full of holes as a sieve Shenonymous Aug 2014 #21