Libertarians and Communists: Two Sides of the Same Douchenozzle

[rug]

30. As a matter of fact you didn't. To wit:

The closer they got to getting 100% of what they demanded without realizing utopia, and the smaller the share of power allowed for alternative opinions, the more intensely the blame for all failures had to be focused on that diminishing opposition in order to Keep The Faith.

In the 20th century, the above described Communism - the corruption of an originally benevolent, compassion-driven movement into a petulant cesspool of bigotry, unreason, and oppression.

If you believe the first excerpt, you've ignored 83% of 20th century history because a) at no point did self-described communist governments or movements approach anything near a majority, much less get near 100%, and b) these governments merely attempted socialism, not communism, and were from 1917 onward under continuous threats and multiple, actual armed interventions which turned the policies from rudimentary socialism into state survival.

To continue your second excerpt:

But in the late 20th and into the 21st, it describes Libertarianism - the corruption of an originally responsible, rational principle akin to the Hippocratic Oath applied to governance, into an excuse for malignant sociopaths with money to dismantle civilization and replace it with depraved feudal tyranny. In the 20th century, the world was threatened by the Politburo.

If you consider libertarianism, even as a concept, to be "an originally benevolent, compassion-driven movement", you either do not understand what it is or, consider what is actually is to be benevolent. It isn't. It is an elevation of the self which is the antithes if what communism is.

I truly hope you did not hand anything remotely like this post into your political science class.