Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When do we start calling this a 'cover-up' by the Obama White House? [View all]Cant take the truth!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I suppose the severity of a cover-up does depend on what's actually being obscured
bigtree
Aug 2014
#6
what about something along the lines he expressed Friday in partial defense of the Bush activity?
bigtree
Aug 2014
#65
Yes, participating in a cover-up of war crimes that are widely known is the best way to ...
Scuba
Aug 2014
#76
I don't think anyone would be seriously talking about the President's responsibility in any of that
bigtree
Aug 2014
#81
Torture is no more a "political decision" than molesting a child. The fact that it was systemic
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#54
I'm not looking for a position trying to mount vapid defenses of some of the worst of the dark ages
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#67
Your job is far more important. Politicians manipulate and obfuscate and do whatever
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#26
there should be an investigation of the Brennan CIA's actions regarding the Senate investigation
bigtree
Aug 2014
#15
He can prove that by firing Brennen, and Clapper and all the other Republicans
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#27
I hope you are wrong about Obama's knowledge but it seems I'm never quite cynical enough.
pa28
Aug 2014
#40
We don't know what the President knew before about the CIA's activiities. But we know
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#60
Weak. That isn't even logically consistent. It was a republican administration
morningfog
Aug 2014
#34
Seems to me like you are on the wrong side of the torture issue. And calling people
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#68
At this point, no I don't. (to answer the question in the title of this response)
Raine1967
Aug 2014
#29
Some are circling the wagons so hard that if called on will oppose all they fought for
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#36
You and Sid with the same talking points. Sadly, that's all you got is calling people names.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#69
So what's your point? Are you saying you apologize for Cheney's torture program?
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#70
If the release of the "executive summary" of torture is delayed any longer, we need to contact
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#83
When do we start calling this a (redacted) by the (redacted) (redacted)?"
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2014
#74
It has been the entire time, hence the "look forward" aka look the other way
Corruption Inc
Aug 2014
#85