Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Jimmy Carter: "How To Fix It": Ending this war in Gaza begins with recognizing Hamas [View all]Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)61. OBVIOUSLY!! To quote a former Israeli Foreign Minister:
"SHLOMO BEN-AMI: Yes, Hamas. I think that in my view there is almost sort of poetic justice with this victory of Hamas. After all, what is the reason for this nostalgia for Arafat and for the P.L.O.? Did they run the affairs of the Palestinians in a clean way? You mentioned the corruption, the inefficiency. Of course, Israel has contributed a lot to the disintegration of the Palestinian system, no doubt about it, but their leaders failed them. Their leaders betrayed them, and the victory of Hamas is justice being made in many ways. So we cannot preach democracy and then say that those who won are not accepted by us. Either there is democracy or there is no democracy.
And with these people, I think they are much more pragmatic than is normally perceived. In the 1990s, they invented the concept of a temporary settlement with Israel. 1990s was the first time that Hamas spoke about a temporary settlement with Israel. In 2003, they declared unilaterally a truce, and the reason they declared the truce is this, that with Arafat, whose the system of government was one of divide and rule, they were discarded from the political system. Mahmoud Abbas has integrated them into the political system, and this is what brought them to the truce. They are interested in politicizing themselves, in becoming a politic entity. And we need to try and see ways where we can work with them.
Now, everybody says they need first to recognize the state of Israel and end terrorism. Believe me, I would like them to do so today, but they are not going to do that. They are eventually going to do that in the future, but only as part of a quid pro quo, just as the P.L.O. did it. The P.L.O., when Rabin came to negotiate with them, also didn't recognize the state of Israel, and they engaged in all kind of nasty practices. And therefore, we need to be much more realistic and abandon worn-out cliches and see whether we can reach something with these people. I believe that a long-term interim agreement between Israel and Hamas, even if it is not directly negotiated between the parties, but through a third party, is feasible and possible."
http://www.democracynow.org/2006/2/14/fmr_israeli_foreign_minister_shlomo_ben
__________
Hamas's official offer of a long term truce with Israel from Ahmed Yousef:
Hamas's official offer of a long term truce with Israel from Ahmed Yousef:
By AHMED YOUSEF
Originally Published: November 1, 2006 in the New York Times
"Ahmed Yousef is a senior adviser to the Palestinian prime minister, Ismail Haniya."
"HERE in Gaza, few dream of peace. For now, most dare only to dream of a lack of war. It is for this reason that Hamas proposes a long-term truce during which the Israeli and Palestinian peoples can try to negotiate a lasting peace.
A truce is referred to in Arabic as a ''hudna.'' Typically covering 10 years, a hudna is recognized in Islamic jurisprudence as a legitimate and binding contract. A hudna extends beyond the Western concept of a cease-fire and obliges the parties to use the period to seek a permanent, nonviolent resolution to their differences. The Koran finds great merit in such efforts at promoting understanding among different people. Whereas war dehumanizes the enemy and makes it easier to kill, a hudna affords the opportunity to humanize one's opponents and understand their position with the goal of resolving the intertribal or international dispute.
Such a concept -- a period of nonwar but only partial resolution of a conflict -- is foreign to the West and has been greeted with much suspicion. Many Westerners I speak to wonder how one can stop the violence without ending the conflict.
I would argue, however, that this concept is not as foreign as it might seem. After all, the Irish Republican Army agreed to halt its military struggle to free Northern Ireland from British rule without recognizing British sovereignty. Irish Republicans continue to aspire to a united Ireland free of British rule, but rely upon peaceful methods. Had the I.R.A. been forced to renounce its vision of reuniting Ireland before negotiations could occur, peace would never have prevailed. Why should more be demanded of the Palestinians, particularly when the spirit of our people will never permit it?
When Hamas gives its word to an international agreement, it does so in the name of God and will therefore keep its word. Hamas has honored its previous cease-fires, as Israelis grudgingly note with the oft-heard words, ''At least with Hamas they mean what they say.''
This offer of hudna is no ruse, as some assert, to strengthen our military machine, to buy time to organize better or to consolidate our hold on the Palestinian Authority. Indeed, faith-based political movements in Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Morocco, Turkey and Yemen have used hudna-like strategies to avoid expanding conflict. Hamas will conduct itself just as wisely and honorably.
We Palestinians are prepared to enter into a hudna to bring about an immediate end to the occupation and to initiate a period of peaceful coexistence during which both sides would refrain from any form of military aggression or provocation. During this period of calm and negotiation we can address the important issues like the right of return and the release of prisoners. If the negotiations fail to achieve a durable settlement, the next generation of Palestinians and Israelis will have to decide whether or not to renew the hudna and the search for a negotiated peace.
There can be no comprehensive solution of the conflict today, this week, this month, or even this year. A conflict that has festered for so long may, however, be resolved through a decade of peaceful coexistence and negotiations. This is the only sensible alternative to the current situation. A hudna will lead to an end to the occupation and create the space and the calm necessary to resolve all outstanding issues.
Few in Gaza dream. For most of the past six months it's been difficult to even sleep. Yet hope is not dead. And when we dare to hope, this is what we see: a 10-year hudna during which, inshallah (God willing), we will learn again to dream of peace.
Ahmed Yousef is a senior adviser to the Palestinian prime minister, Ismail Haniya. "
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
President Jimmy Carter: "How To Fix It": Ending this war in Gaza begins with recognizing Hamas [View all]
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
OP
The president needs to send Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton to sort this out
Rhiannon12866
Aug 2014
#4
Actually, I was thinking of him more as an adviser to President Carter, LOL
Rhiannon12866
Aug 2014
#45
"Kill all Jews" is not in their Charter, more lies. Give it up, Israel's moral failures are clear.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#72
Funny how a "Liberal" will suddenly buy Right Wing propaganda if it's anti-Palestinian.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#77
I think it's cute to use Wolf Blitzer as a reliable source for the truth....
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#75
Thank you. Too many freaking liberals buying into obvious propaganda...shades of Iraq.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#79
When Israel and Hamas were cooperating with each other in 2013 rocket attacks dropped 98%
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#24
Yes we have, I remember making this post and this should tell you a few things.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#28
Netanyahu's mass retribution turning a tragic crime into an act of war is what escalated both
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#38
They were about to hold elections after the unity government agreement between Fatah/Hamas and
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#30
Being blockaded in a dense open air prison, Ghetto with a 70% poverty rate creates a powder keg
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#42
Why not? Their members were being rounded up in mass numbers for the actions of two.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#46
If all you have are rocks that's what you stock up on, they have no air force, no navy, no tanks,
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#48
It's a matter of pride. If you can't stop a well-armed imperial power from destroying your
eridani
Aug 2014
#51
Yea, because 1.8 million impoverished people trapped in an open air prison ghetto is like a man that
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#83
Palestine has a right to defend itself. If not Hamas, some form of Palestinian military
morningfog
Aug 2014
#29
But long range artillery into an urban area, armed drones, bombs dropped...all defensive.?.....
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#73
Interesting. Quite the contrast to Clinton's recent thoughts on the matter. nt
adirondacker
Aug 2014
#19
He's right. And had we "recognized" Saddam there would have been no need for invading...BUT
kelliekat44
Aug 2014
#20
I'll take Jimmy Carter's word for it. He knows more than anybody in the world...
Peace Patriot
Aug 2014
#49
here is a list of morons who have been advocating exactly that for years
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2014
#62
See Post 70. Powell talked about a dialogue with Hamas, not recognition ot its legitimacy.
badtoworse
Aug 2014
#71
Destruction of "Israel" not the destruction of Jews. It's really about land and resources.
kelliekat44
Aug 2014
#63