Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When do we start calling this a 'cover-up' by the Obama White House? [View all]Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)86. You are wasting your time replying to some here. It is
sad to see supposed Dems condoning these activities.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I suppose the severity of a cover-up does depend on what's actually being obscured
bigtree
Aug 2014
#6
what about something along the lines he expressed Friday in partial defense of the Bush activity?
bigtree
Aug 2014
#65
Yes, participating in a cover-up of war crimes that are widely known is the best way to ...
Scuba
Aug 2014
#76
I don't think anyone would be seriously talking about the President's responsibility in any of that
bigtree
Aug 2014
#81
Torture is no more a "political decision" than molesting a child. The fact that it was systemic
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#54
I'm not looking for a position trying to mount vapid defenses of some of the worst of the dark ages
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#67
Your job is far more important. Politicians manipulate and obfuscate and do whatever
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#26
there should be an investigation of the Brennan CIA's actions regarding the Senate investigation
bigtree
Aug 2014
#15
He can prove that by firing Brennen, and Clapper and all the other Republicans
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#27
I hope you are wrong about Obama's knowledge but it seems I'm never quite cynical enough.
pa28
Aug 2014
#40
We don't know what the President knew before about the CIA's activiities. But we know
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#60
Weak. That isn't even logically consistent. It was a republican administration
morningfog
Aug 2014
#34
Seems to me like you are on the wrong side of the torture issue. And calling people
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#68
At this point, no I don't. (to answer the question in the title of this response)
Raine1967
Aug 2014
#29
Some are circling the wagons so hard that if called on will oppose all they fought for
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#36
You and Sid with the same talking points. Sadly, that's all you got is calling people names.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#69
So what's your point? Are you saying you apologize for Cheney's torture program?
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#70
If the release of the "executive summary" of torture is delayed any longer, we need to contact
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#83
When do we start calling this a (redacted) by the (redacted) (redacted)?"
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2014
#74
It has been the entire time, hence the "look forward" aka look the other way
Corruption Inc
Aug 2014
#85