Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Weight gain in the American population 1960-2000 [View all]
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad347.pdfThe definitive data are in the above paper. I used the Excel chart function to see how the numbers came out visually. What really jumped out at me was that the crucial dividing year was 1980. Any discussion of possible causes must use this year as a reference. The internet was not in widespread use until the late 90s, so that isn't it. What about HCFS? Was 1980 a turning point of some sort nutritionally? One obvious point to make is that that year is the start of the destruction of the American middle class.
The NHANES studiess are by decade--1960, 1970, 1980, 1990 and 2000. Do a linear regression on 1960, 1970 and 1980, and then on 1980, 1990, and 2000. You get pretty straight lines as indicated by the correlation coefficients. The slopes are an indication of the rate of increase in average weight gain.
Men 1960-1980
Slope = 3.75
R2 = 0.7899
Women 1960-1980
Slope = 2.56
R2 = 0.9204
Men 1980-2000
Slope = 8.6
R2 = 1.000
Women 1980-2000
Slope = 9.4
R2 = 0.9976
For men, after 1980 the rate of increase increased by a factor of 2.3 times.
For women, after 1980 the rate of increase increased by a factor of 3.6 times.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My parents got their first remote control in the early '80s when they got cable TV
bklyncowgirl
Aug 2014
#90
That would be my first choice. Also, obesity is linked with poverty in affluent societies
eridani
Aug 2014
#8
the suburbs themselves changed as well in the 80s--they were easier to invest in
MisterP
Aug 2014
#61
Two 1980 factors. Corn sugar replaced real sugar in soft drinks and we got Nutrasweet.
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#13
The body recognizes fructose as food but absorbs it more easily than other sugars (sucrose, lactose)
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#34
^^THIS^^ But also add the introduction of the two-liter bottle of soft drinks
Turn CO Blue
Aug 2014
#49
The OP was actually about vastly higher rates of population weight gain after 1980 as
eridani
Aug 2014
#97
Unhealthiness is profitable to well-heeled private interests, so we subsidize unhealthiness.
Romulox
Aug 2014
#18
My primary go-to book on nutrition science is Gary Taubes' "Good Calories, Bad Calories"
GliderGuider
Aug 2014
#48
Red Yeast Rice Extract, the natural source of all statins has been around
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#73
Another factor: The rise of all-day snacking and the growth of the availability of
Arugula Latte
Aug 2014
#23
My "vote" is for HFCS. Whatever the reason, you can bet we're fatter due to some
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#39
keep on subsidizing cheap food grown with agrotoxins, inhumane treatment of animals
wordpix
Aug 2014
#76
probably a combination of easily available junk food and TV, Video Games, Computers
JI7
Aug 2014
#70
I'll weigh in with this tidbit. I was just thinking the other day about 4 ounce juice glasses.
snagglepuss
Aug 2014
#78