Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Climate scientist drops the F-bomb after startling Arctic discovery [View all]Jim__
(15,215 posts)15. In the story you cited, the bubbles weren't reaching the surface.
None of the plumes the team saw reached the surface, so the methane was not escaping into the atmosphere and thus contributing to climate change not in that area, at least. "Bigger bubbles of methane make it all the way to the top, but smaller ones dissolve," says Minshull.
Just because it fails to reach the surface doesn't mean the methane is harmless, though, as some of it gets converted to carbon dioxide. The CO2 then dissolves in seawater and makes the oceans more acidic
Just because it fails to reach the surface doesn't mean the methane is harmless, though, as some of it gets converted to carbon dioxide. The CO2 then dissolves in seawater and makes the oceans more acidic
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Climate scientist drops the F-bomb after startling Arctic discovery [View all]
geardaddy
Aug 2014
OP
Point me to where I said it was a "non issue" - oh that's right you can't, cause I didn't.
redqueen
Aug 2014
#4
According to the expert, the bubbles reaching the surface is what is new, at least to him.
Jim__
Aug 2014
#25
I pointed that out in the other thread she links too and she seems upset by what I don't know,
neverforget
Aug 2014
#56
Before I read this post... Don't tell me!! The scientist said "We're fucked." Ok, I'll now go
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#5
you don't think obama understands or cares? the urgency may be debatable but the
certainot
Aug 2014
#57
Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act that allows Republican wealthy and corporations
JDPriestly
Aug 2014
#63
the fairness doctrine was the key to allowing those radio stations to be used as
certainot
Aug 2014
#65
His support of "clean coal" and expanding off shore oil exploration says otherwise.
progressoid
Aug 2014
#64
Talk radio is not stopping Obama and the other corporate Dems from opposing fossil fuels.
progressoid
Aug 2014
#68
it's politics and environmental groups give oil/coal radio a free speech free ride and
certainot
Aug 2014
#76
The oceans can dissolve a lot of gas. When the pressure of the gas overtakes the strength forces
DhhD
Aug 2014
#55
Forever, from no onwards, whenever anyone denies science for political gain,
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2014
#61