Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Weight gain in the American population 1960-2000 [View all]GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)103. Aspartame probably plays a role.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame
It was approved by the FDA in 1981, and it has been shown to cause weight gain unrelated to caloric intake:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666312004138
However, it's probably not a single-factor change. A set of factors seem to have converged around 1980 that contributed to this change in the slopes of the curves that you describe. Likely candidates include the introduction of aspartame, the beginning of the FDA/AMA/NHLBI "War on Fat" (resulting in excessive refined carbs and gluten/gliadin in processed food, that in accelerated the spread of metabolic syndrome), and advertising-driven changes in dietary habits ("May we supersize you?"
IMO it's unlikely to have been changes in exercise habits among children, as the increase in obesity is seen across all age groups. While the overall reduction in physical activity probably plays a role in the overall increase in obesity, I can't imagine how a gradual trend like that would contribute to an abrupt kink in the curves in 1980.
It was approved by the FDA in 1981, and it has been shown to cause weight gain unrelated to caloric intake:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666312004138
Abstract
It has been suggested that the use of nonnutritive sweeteners (NNSs) can lead to weight gain, but evidence regarding their real effect in body weight and satiety is still inconclusive. Using a rat model, the present study compares the effect of saccharin and aspartame to sucrose in body weight gain and in caloric intake. Twenty-nine male Wistar rats received plain yogurt sweetened with 20% sucrose, 0.3% sodium saccharin or 0.4% aspartame, in addition to chow and water ad libitum, while physical activity was restrained. Measurements of cumulative body weight gain, total caloric intake, caloric intake of chow and caloric intake of sweetened yogurt were performed weekly for 12 weeks. Results showed that addition of either saccharin or aspartame to yogurt resulted in increased weight gain compared to addition of sucrose, however total caloric intake was similar among groups. In conclusion, greater weight gain was promoted by the use of saccharin or aspartame, compared with sucrose, and this weight gain was unrelated to caloric intake. We speculate that a decrease in energy expenditure or increase in fluid retention might be involved.
It has been suggested that the use of nonnutritive sweeteners (NNSs) can lead to weight gain, but evidence regarding their real effect in body weight and satiety is still inconclusive. Using a rat model, the present study compares the effect of saccharin and aspartame to sucrose in body weight gain and in caloric intake. Twenty-nine male Wistar rats received plain yogurt sweetened with 20% sucrose, 0.3% sodium saccharin or 0.4% aspartame, in addition to chow and water ad libitum, while physical activity was restrained. Measurements of cumulative body weight gain, total caloric intake, caloric intake of chow and caloric intake of sweetened yogurt were performed weekly for 12 weeks. Results showed that addition of either saccharin or aspartame to yogurt resulted in increased weight gain compared to addition of sucrose, however total caloric intake was similar among groups. In conclusion, greater weight gain was promoted by the use of saccharin or aspartame, compared with sucrose, and this weight gain was unrelated to caloric intake. We speculate that a decrease in energy expenditure or increase in fluid retention might be involved.
However, it's probably not a single-factor change. A set of factors seem to have converged around 1980 that contributed to this change in the slopes of the curves that you describe. Likely candidates include the introduction of aspartame, the beginning of the FDA/AMA/NHLBI "War on Fat" (resulting in excessive refined carbs and gluten/gliadin in processed food, that in accelerated the spread of metabolic syndrome), and advertising-driven changes in dietary habits ("May we supersize you?"
IMO it's unlikely to have been changes in exercise habits among children, as the increase in obesity is seen across all age groups. While the overall reduction in physical activity probably plays a role in the overall increase in obesity, I can't imagine how a gradual trend like that would contribute to an abrupt kink in the curves in 1980.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My parents got their first remote control in the early '80s when they got cable TV
bklyncowgirl
Aug 2014
#90
That would be my first choice. Also, obesity is linked with poverty in affluent societies
eridani
Aug 2014
#8
the suburbs themselves changed as well in the 80s--they were easier to invest in
MisterP
Aug 2014
#61
Two 1980 factors. Corn sugar replaced real sugar in soft drinks and we got Nutrasweet.
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#13
The body recognizes fructose as food but absorbs it more easily than other sugars (sucrose, lactose)
KurtNYC
Aug 2014
#34
^^THIS^^ But also add the introduction of the two-liter bottle of soft drinks
Turn CO Blue
Aug 2014
#49
The OP was actually about vastly higher rates of population weight gain after 1980 as
eridani
Aug 2014
#97
Unhealthiness is profitable to well-heeled private interests, so we subsidize unhealthiness.
Romulox
Aug 2014
#18
My primary go-to book on nutrition science is Gary Taubes' "Good Calories, Bad Calories"
GliderGuider
Aug 2014
#48
Red Yeast Rice Extract, the natural source of all statins has been around
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#73
Another factor: The rise of all-day snacking and the growth of the availability of
Arugula Latte
Aug 2014
#23
My "vote" is for HFCS. Whatever the reason, you can bet we're fatter due to some
ChisolmTrailDem
Aug 2014
#39
keep on subsidizing cheap food grown with agrotoxins, inhumane treatment of animals
wordpix
Aug 2014
#76
probably a combination of easily available junk food and TV, Video Games, Computers
JI7
Aug 2014
#70
I'll weigh in with this tidbit. I was just thinking the other day about 4 ounce juice glasses.
snagglepuss
Aug 2014
#78