Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
42. Hey....morningfog....taking out artillery aimed at civilians IS true humanitarianism.
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 01:21 PM
Aug 2014

I mean, I'm sure everybody enjoyed the water and the MREs (insert laughter here) but I bet the civilians who are there are grateful there's a lesser chance of them getting shot to shit tonight.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What US personnel are in Erbil? Are they at the Mosul Dam? morningfog Aug 2014 #1
You don't think we should protect our personnel in Erbil? TwilightGardener Aug 2014 #2
We shouldn't have any personnel there. morningfog Aug 2014 #4
But we do. Diplomatic personnel and military advisors were moved there. TwilightGardener Aug 2014 #6
we're not supposed to have diplomatic relations with the Kurds? renegade000 Aug 2014 #8
So we bomb anywhere anytime there is a threat "near" a US consulate? morningfog Aug 2014 #13
well, i guess we can have Erbil become the new Benghazi renegade000 Aug 2014 #24
Erbil houses our diplomatic mission to the Kurdish Autonomous Region. Laelth Aug 2014 #53
Like Money, Sir, Destruction Of Military Assets Is Fungible The Magistrate Aug 2014 #3
I didn't suggest it wasn't. morningfog Aug 2014 #5
Then No Point In Hinting At 'Bait And Switch' In A Header, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #10
I just want to keep track of the reasons for our attacks. morningfog Aug 2014 #14
"Near U.S. personnel" is obtuse and ever so fungible.....no debating the wide latitude that gives. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #9
Alas, the range of modern artillery makes it less obtuse and fungible.nt stevenleser Aug 2014 #18
I notice the advancements in military hardware also, the better it gets the more civilians die. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #20
certainly within the President's order bigtree Aug 2014 #17
We Can Speak Clearly, Sir, I Expect, To One Another The Magistrate Aug 2014 #22
that's a reasonable expectation bigtree Aug 2014 #27
When It Comes To Cases, Sir, 'Peshmerga' Are Green The Magistrate Aug 2014 #29
again, a reasonable view. Thank you for your answers bigtree Aug 2014 #34
The Kurds were stretched thin in the area while building a new border.. EX500rider Aug 2014 #39
thanks for that perspective bigtree Aug 2014 #44
America is using "near U.S.personell" as the justification for air strikes, eh? Kind of like reverse Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #7
Except That Is Not What Is Being done, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #11
The power not to get a joke and turn ones own misunderstanding into a treatise is what is cynical. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #12
Bob Would Be Ashamed Of You, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #15
So Bob's your uncle? Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #16
Sold My Soul Long Ago, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #19
This OP should be titled "I'm hunting for a reason to be outraged" stevenleser Aug 2014 #21
I don't think that's fair bigtree Aug 2014 #23
If those supporting it were reaching in their justifications like this, they would deserve similar stevenleser Aug 2014 #26
This is not our fight. morningfog Aug 2014 #28
It is our fight....see below. nt msanthrope Aug 2014 #33
Idiot-boy's war crime made it our responsibility. We screwed that country. stevenleser Aug 2014 #40
We rightfully withdrew our troops. We should stay out. morningfog Aug 2014 #45
it's not bullshit Steve bigtree Aug 2014 #30
This OP attempts to assert that we are going outside of the President's announced boundaries last stevenleser Aug 2014 #41
the only manufactured outrage I see is your own bigtree Aug 2014 #43
I'm sure most people can see the OP for what it is. An attempt to Manufacture Outrage. nt stevenleser Aug 2014 #46
give it a fucking rest bigtree Aug 2014 #47
Feel free to trash it steve. No deleting, no reason to. morningfog Aug 2014 #25
no reason to delete, at all, morningfog bigtree Aug 2014 #31
You know, I got arrested outside the fucking Iraqi Embassy in the 1980's protesting msanthrope Aug 2014 #32
This is not the 1980s, not chemical weapons, not Saddam Hussein morningfog Aug 2014 #35
It's still Kurdistan, and you know what? Taking out ISIS artillery is the most humane msanthrope Aug 2014 #37
I am opposing the renewed use if the US military morningfog Aug 2014 #38
Hey....morningfog....taking out artillery aimed at civilians IS true humanitarianism. msanthrope Aug 2014 #42
But that isn't the proffered justification. It is to protect US personnel and facilities "near" morningfog Aug 2014 #48
Yes....who do you think is delivering the aid? You take out the artillery so that msanthrope Aug 2014 #51
Missing the point I think RunInCircles Aug 2014 #36
Yeah, we're bombing ISIS to protect Erbil and not the Yazidi's stranded on Mt Sinjar neverforget Aug 2014 #49
Even more, we are protecting US interests in Erbil and nothing more. morningfog Aug 2014 #50
K&R Watch what they do, not what they say. woo me with science Aug 2014 #52
Important OP. Kick. woo me with science Aug 2014 #54
kick woo me with science Aug 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US forces in combat in Ir...»Reply #42