Seriously???? He thinks they should be treating Ebola with selenium (for no good reason, btw) and you want to give him props for trying? 
Is it still "character assassination" if it's true? He's a certified quack. Q-U-A-C-K. For some 'actual information' to back up my personal opinion, may I suggest:
http://sciblogs.co.nz/code-for-life/2012/09/02/bad-science-baking-soda-fungi-cancer-nuclear-fallout-rosacea-and-hilary-butler/
He's also an anti-vax cheerleader who thinks RFK Jr. is a hero for his anti-vax stance.
I cannot "debate" with you about "the actual information" on his website, because the things on said website are completely lacking in any of the characteristics of "actual information" -- you know, those pesky things we like to call "facts." You admit his idea of treating cancer with baking soda is nuts, but you're willing to accept his claims about other things? I am too cynical I guess, and lack the ability to be that trusting.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read