Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The War Photo No One Would Publish [View all]
From the First Gulf War....
Warning! GRAPHIC photos in this link!
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/08/the-war-photo-no-one-would-publish/375762/
The Iraqi soldier died attempting to pull himself up over the dashboard of his truck. The flames engulfed his vehicle and incinerated his body, turning him to dusty ash and blackened bone. In a photograph taken soon afterward, the soldiers hand reaches out of the shattered windshield, which frames his face and chest. The colors and textures of his hand and shoulders look like those of the scorched and rusted metal around him. Fire has destroyed most of his features, leaving behind a skeletal face, fixed in a final rictus. He stares without eyes.
On February 28, 1991, Kenneth Jarecke stood in front of the charred man, parked amid the carbonized bodies of his fellow soldiers, and photographed him. At one point, before he died this dramatic mid-retreat death, the soldier had had a name. Hed fought in Saddam Husseins army and had a rank and an assignment and a unit. He might have been devoted to the dictator who sent him to occupy Kuwait and fight the Americans. Or he might have been an unlucky young man with no prospects, recruited off the streets of Baghdad.
Jarecke took the picture just before a ceasefire officially ended Operation Desert Stormthe U.S.-led military action that drove Saddam Hussein and his troops out of Kuwait, which they had annexed and occupied the previous August. The image and its anonymous subject might have come to symbolize the Gulf War. Instead, it went unpublished in the United States, not because of military obstruction but because of editorial choices.
Its hard to calculate the consequences of a photographs absence. But sanitized images of warfare, The Atlantics Conor Friedersdorf argues, make it easier to accept bloodless language such as 1991 references to surgical strikes or modern-day terminology like kinetic warfare. The Vietnam War was notable for its catalog of chilling and iconic war photography; Some images, like Ron Haeberles pictures of the My Lai massacre, were initially kept from the public. But other violent imagesNick Uts scene of child napalm victims and Eddie Adamss photo of a Vietcong mans executionwon Pulitzer Prizes and had a tremendous impact on the outcome of the war.
On February 28, 1991, Kenneth Jarecke stood in front of the charred man, parked amid the carbonized bodies of his fellow soldiers, and photographed him. At one point, before he died this dramatic mid-retreat death, the soldier had had a name. Hed fought in Saddam Husseins army and had a rank and an assignment and a unit. He might have been devoted to the dictator who sent him to occupy Kuwait and fight the Americans. Or he might have been an unlucky young man with no prospects, recruited off the streets of Baghdad.
Jarecke took the picture just before a ceasefire officially ended Operation Desert Stormthe U.S.-led military action that drove Saddam Hussein and his troops out of Kuwait, which they had annexed and occupied the previous August. The image and its anonymous subject might have come to symbolize the Gulf War. Instead, it went unpublished in the United States, not because of military obstruction but because of editorial choices.
Its hard to calculate the consequences of a photographs absence. But sanitized images of warfare, The Atlantics Conor Friedersdorf argues, make it easier to accept bloodless language such as 1991 references to surgical strikes or modern-day terminology like kinetic warfare. The Vietnam War was notable for its catalog of chilling and iconic war photography; Some images, like Ron Haeberles pictures of the My Lai massacre, were initially kept from the public. But other violent imagesNick Uts scene of child napalm victims and Eddie Adamss photo of a Vietcong mans executionwon Pulitzer Prizes and had a tremendous impact on the outcome of the war.
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Horrific, such photos tell the truth in war, how can there be Honor in murdering strangers?
AuntPatsy
Aug 2014
#1
I and my buddies thank you and the millions of citizens around the world for standing up for us.
IronGate
Aug 2014
#11
I appreciate it that you can thank those of us that protested. But I still feel guilt. We didn't
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#14
Y'all did what you could do considering that the media was touting the Bush 1 and 2 bullshit
IronGate
Aug 2014
#16
I do too. It is so discouraging. I dragged my kids to a few anti-war rallies - so they'd start to
calimary
Aug 2014
#20