Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bombing Iraq. Not what I voted for. [View all]SidDithers
(44,333 posts)55. The OP is...nt
Sid
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
1) we destabilized Iraq & Syria 2) we supported ISIS 3) we committed wholesale murder 4) we tortured
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#80
Hell no! I don't vote for people who can only see violence as the solution to their problems. I
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#138
We are exhorted to ignore the patterns. Did you see this post by IchingCarpenter?
woo me with science
Aug 2014
#67
well, then if bombing Iraq was not what you wanted, you shouldn't have voted for Obomba
ellenrr
Aug 2014
#7
you all should ask yourself: How come many of us knew what Obama would do BEFORE he was elected??
ellenrr
Aug 2014
#140
You are terribly naive if you think any US President is not going to bomb something somewhere.
DCBob
Aug 2014
#11
I suppose when those murderous maniacs are forced to give up trying to take over Iraq and..
DCBob
Aug 2014
#119
What's more naive is thinking Americancan end a 1400 year old war by using bombs and torture.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#85
Like Saddam? Every right wing talking point has been fetched from the recycling bin.
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#25
Hussein really was a wolf too. As was Gaddafi. There are all kinds of wolves.
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#61
Why not aside from devotion and stubbornness, at least as it relates to actions in the region
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#124
Let me remind you, these are the same 'evil' forces we supplied to overthrow Syria.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#88
So? That doesn't necessarily mean that trying to stop ISIS springs solely from a profit motive.
randome
Aug 2014
#111
More Third Way surrealism. There are several good arguments against bombing above.
woo me with science
Aug 2014
#72
Because our violent solutions thus far simply further destabilize the region, agreed? Or is it
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#89
We got ISIS by funding these same rebels in Syria. It's a cycle of violence. Just like Vietnam begat
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#82
Our representative vote for us. When the cease to represent us, they should be removed.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#81
The list of things I didn't vote for is a hell of a lot longer at this point
woo me with science
Aug 2014
#16
If by 'we', you mean America through the years, yes, we have done some atrocious things.
randome
Aug 2014
#41
If the first guy who posted that sentiment had been escorted off the property....
JTFrog
Aug 2014
#77
No, I support his effort to close tax loopholes for off shored corporations.
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#96
Yeah, the Repukes posing as liberals to stir shit are sickening. Good catch. eom
MohRokTah
Aug 2014
#49
This appears to be the new talking point. That those who criticize bombing Iraq again
woo me with science
Aug 2014
#39
The OP wants a President who would not use military force under any circumstances?
Vattel
Aug 2014
#56
you can only think in terms of "generals" and followers, isn't that right?
TheSarcastinator
Aug 2014
#74
He is elected to represent us. We need to let him know our opinion. His job is to do what the
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#91
And sometimes the President needs to make a difficult decision that goes against
IronGate
Aug 2014
#95
If he had listened to us and remained uninvolved in Syria, Assad would have crushed ISIS in Syria
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#100
Well, he seems fine with allowing us to torture people. When does the bombing end? By what metric?
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#109
It's pretty easy to take a tank out with anti tank missiles, same for the humvees
IronGate
Aug 2014
#115
I can get behind supplying the Kurds... Only with a new tax on the wealthy to pay for it and a vote
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#117
+10000 The Global Defense Industry needs to be the topic of discussion.
woo me with science
Aug 2014
#78
Many did not vote any wars but Roosevelt found himself in a situation outside of his control.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#90
Ah, but we funded ISIS in a glib attempt to overthrow Assad in Syria. So, in my view,
grahamhgreen
Aug 2014
#93
The US pushed to get Saddam in power while Dddy Bush was with the CIS, Baby Bush got him out.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#114