Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, just so I got this straight... [View all]rug
(82,333 posts)49. Which brings us back to the starting point.
While this action is couched in humanitarian terms, it remains a military action. Military force should be used when there is a defined goal and a strategy to achieve that goal. This decision looks like a no-brainer but the long term rationale behind it has not been articulated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well I guess only time will tell what possibly that long-term solution is.
Drunken Irishman
Aug 2014
#50
I said in '03, and I repeat today, the Iraq Attaq will one day tear this country apart . . .
Journeyman
Aug 2014
#8
I call bullshit on your post, it starts with the absurd acceptance of "moderate forces"
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#79
McCain wanted the USA to fund them. Wonder what country/Corp. McCain got to fund them?
Sunlei
Aug 2014
#57
I may change my mind about ISIS as more evidence comes out but at this point I beleive they
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#17
Thanks. Your idea that "nothing is working" needs to be addressed more. I think many here have
ancianita
Aug 2014
#22
Thank Jeebus he didn't use the word "folks." There might have been a riot. nt
msanthrope
Aug 2014
#54