Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Thomas Frank calls out blind partisanship by Dems [View all]
It's a compelling read, aimed squarely at a familiar DU talking point:
Let me explain what I mean by reminding you of one of the most disturbing news stories to come across the wires in the last month. In a much-reported study, the Russell Sage Foundation discovered that median household wealth in this country fell by 36 percent in the 10-year period ending last year. Wealth for people at the top, as other news stories remind us, has continued to soar. These things are a consequence of the Great Recession, of course, but they are also a reminder of the grand narrative of our time: The lot of average Americans constantly seems to be growing worse. The Great Depression of the 1930s was awful, but it set America on the path toward a period of shared prosperity. Our bout of hard times has had the opposite effect. It has accelerated the unraveling of the middle class itself.
Now, you can blame the risible, Ayn Rand-reading Tea Party types for this if you like, and you can also blame the George W. Bush Administration. They both deserve it. But sooner or later you will also have to acknowledge that there are two parties in this country, not just one; that the Democrats held significant power during the period in question, including (for much of it) the presidency itself; and that even when they are not in the White House, these Democrats nevertheless retain the capacity to persuade and to organize. For a party of the left, dreadful news like this should be rocket fuel. For the Dems, however, it hasnt been. Why is that? Well, for one thing, because a good number of those Democrats have not really objected to the economic policies that have worked these awful changes over the years. They may believe in the theory of evolutionhell, they may savor the same Jon Stewart jokes that you do but a lot of them also believe in the conventional economic wisdom of the day. They dont really care that union power has evaporated and that Wall Street got itself de-supervised and that oligopolies now dominate the economy. But they do careever so much!about deficits and being fiscally responsible.
Bring up this obvious point, however, and you will quickly discover what a dose of chloroform the partisan style can be. Theres a political war on, you will be told; one side is markedly better than the other; and no criticism of the leadership can be tolerated. Instead, lets get back to laughing along with our favorite politicized comedians, and to smacking that Rick Santorum punching bag.
Now, you can blame the risible, Ayn Rand-reading Tea Party types for this if you like, and you can also blame the George W. Bush Administration. They both deserve it. But sooner or later you will also have to acknowledge that there are two parties in this country, not just one; that the Democrats held significant power during the period in question, including (for much of it) the presidency itself; and that even when they are not in the White House, these Democrats nevertheless retain the capacity to persuade and to organize. For a party of the left, dreadful news like this should be rocket fuel. For the Dems, however, it hasnt been. Why is that? Well, for one thing, because a good number of those Democrats have not really objected to the economic policies that have worked these awful changes over the years. They may believe in the theory of evolutionhell, they may savor the same Jon Stewart jokes that you do but a lot of them also believe in the conventional economic wisdom of the day. They dont really care that union power has evaporated and that Wall Street got itself de-supervised and that oligopolies now dominate the economy. But they do careever so much!about deficits and being fiscally responsible.
Bring up this obvious point, however, and you will quickly discover what a dose of chloroform the partisan style can be. Theres a political war on, you will be told; one side is markedly better than the other; and no criticism of the leadership can be tolerated. Instead, lets get back to laughing along with our favorite politicized comedians, and to smacking that Rick Santorum punching bag.
http://www.salon.com/2014/08/10/jon_stewart_is_not_enough_the_curse_of_centrism_and_why_the_tea_party_keeps_rolling_daily_show_democrats/
Now back to being Ready for Hillary...
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm off Warren since she passively announced her position on the Gaza situation
AlbertCat
Aug 2014
#34
No mention, sleight or otherwise, was made of or about atheists, so any insult perceived by
ballyhoo
Aug 2014
#73
I am superior to my God, and that is who I continue reinforcing allegiance to. While
ballyhoo
Aug 2014
#78
So Then the GOP Wins and Doubles Aid to Israel, but Your Conscience is Clean
AndyTiedye
Aug 2014
#84
If H. Clinton-Sachs runs, then all bets are off. It won't be on those of us that won't vote for her
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#94
That depends on the importance of the issue, doesn't it?? And THIS is a VERY important issue. I am
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#92
I would imagine the vast majority of the electorate isn't aware that the number one
octoberlib
Aug 2014
#46
when 10s of thousands of young and old were involved in the occupy movement
questionseverything
Aug 2014
#52
It took a Civil War and millions dying to effect the other. That would be like comparing it to a
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#8
You mistake what I said. I just used that as a comparison, not a suggestion for a strategy.
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#87
What exactly in my response motivates you? Because I feel insulted and condescended to?
2banon
Aug 2014
#41
Certainly you're intelligent enough to know very well there's a hell of a lot more to it than that.
2banon
Aug 2014
#55
I agree with you re: the party and the left when it comes to social issues.
historylovr
Aug 2014
#60
Why do you not eludicate what you mean by 'tactics'. What 'tactics' do liberals have that you
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2014
#63
one side is markedly better than the other; and no criticism of the leadership can be tolerated.
AlbertCat
Aug 2014
#31
Some of this is the Democrats bragging that they can make Wall Street happier than Republicans.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#64
democrats sold their soles to wall street after reagan. BIZNESS FRENDLEE.
pansypoo53219
Aug 2014
#67
THIS. The best thing I've read here in a while. Wasserman-Schultz and Schumer can suck it.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#72
"dreadful news like this should be rocket fuel. For the Dems, however, it hasn’t been."
WorseBeforeBetter
Aug 2014
#77
The White House is Only as Much of a "Bully Pulpit" as the Media Allows it to Be
AndyTiedye
Aug 2014
#97
The Democrats get campaign contributions from corporations too, no real mystery here.
Dustlawyer
Aug 2014
#96
Huge K&R! The most important vote we have today is our money and our time.
raouldukelives
Aug 2014
#100