Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thomas Frank calls out blind partisanship by Dems [View all]historylovr
(1,557 posts)60. I agree with you re: the party and the left when it comes to social issues.
I don't see much sharing of ideas/ideals on the economic side.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm off Warren since she passively announced her position on the Gaza situation
AlbertCat
Aug 2014
#34
No mention, sleight or otherwise, was made of or about atheists, so any insult perceived by
ballyhoo
Aug 2014
#73
I am superior to my God, and that is who I continue reinforcing allegiance to. While
ballyhoo
Aug 2014
#78
So Then the GOP Wins and Doubles Aid to Israel, but Your Conscience is Clean
AndyTiedye
Aug 2014
#84
If H. Clinton-Sachs runs, then all bets are off. It won't be on those of us that won't vote for her
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#94
That depends on the importance of the issue, doesn't it?? And THIS is a VERY important issue. I am
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#92
I would imagine the vast majority of the electorate isn't aware that the number one
octoberlib
Aug 2014
#46
when 10s of thousands of young and old were involved in the occupy movement
questionseverything
Aug 2014
#52
It took a Civil War and millions dying to effect the other. That would be like comparing it to a
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#8
You mistake what I said. I just used that as a comparison, not a suggestion for a strategy.
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#87
What exactly in my response motivates you? Because I feel insulted and condescended to?
2banon
Aug 2014
#41
Certainly you're intelligent enough to know very well there's a hell of a lot more to it than that.
2banon
Aug 2014
#55
I agree with you re: the party and the left when it comes to social issues.
historylovr
Aug 2014
#60
Why do you not eludicate what you mean by 'tactics'. What 'tactics' do liberals have that you
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2014
#63
one side is markedly better than the other; and no criticism of the leadership can be tolerated.
AlbertCat
Aug 2014
#31
Some of this is the Democrats bragging that they can make Wall Street happier than Republicans.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#64
democrats sold their soles to wall street after reagan. BIZNESS FRENDLEE.
pansypoo53219
Aug 2014
#67
THIS. The best thing I've read here in a while. Wasserman-Schultz and Schumer can suck it.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#72
"dreadful news like this should be rocket fuel. For the Dems, however, it hasn’t been."
WorseBeforeBetter
Aug 2014
#77
The White House is Only as Much of a "Bully Pulpit" as the Media Allows it to Be
AndyTiedye
Aug 2014
#97
The Democrats get campaign contributions from corporations too, no real mystery here.
Dustlawyer
Aug 2014
#96
Huge K&R! The most important vote we have today is our money and our time.
raouldukelives
Aug 2014
#100