Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Police use deadly force on black man not using sidewalk [View all]Uncle Joe
(65,206 posts)66. There is this as evidence "Police Brutality Statistics In The United States Fell By 60 Percent When"
Cops Wear Video Cameras"
On a thread by damnedifIknow.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025205873
Police brutality statistics apparently fell by 60 percent in one California town when all police officers were required to wear portable video cameras while on the job.
In a related report by The Inquisitr, a video of a CHP officer punching a fallen woman 11 times in the face went viral after it was filmed by a passing driver. But another video was even worse since it showed Albuquerque police shooting two suspects in the back, never mind when a homeless man was shot in the back.
The city of Rialto, California did a controlled study where the citys 70 police officers were required to wear a video camera that recorded all of their interactions with the public. In 2012 alone complaints against Rialto police officers fell by 88 percent, while use of force by officers fell by almost 60 percent."
* Of course, one huge negative to outfitting every cop with a camera is public privacy concerns. But even the American Civil Liberties Union, which is usually quick to protest anything that might infringe upon personal privacy, says that the notable drop in police brutality statistics is worth it:
Although we generally take a dim view of the proliferation of surveillance cameras in American life, police on-body cameras are different because of their potential to serve as a check against the abuse of power by police officers.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1337944/police-brutality-statistics-in-the-united-states-fell-by-60-percent-when-cops-wear-video-cameras/
Love, peace and the righteous fight, littlemissmartypants.
UJ.
On a thread by damnedifIknow.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025205873
Police brutality statistics apparently fell by 60 percent in one California town when all police officers were required to wear portable video cameras while on the job.
In a related report by The Inquisitr, a video of a CHP officer punching a fallen woman 11 times in the face went viral after it was filmed by a passing driver. But another video was even worse since it showed Albuquerque police shooting two suspects in the back, never mind when a homeless man was shot in the back.
The city of Rialto, California did a controlled study where the citys 70 police officers were required to wear a video camera that recorded all of their interactions with the public. In 2012 alone complaints against Rialto police officers fell by 88 percent, while use of force by officers fell by almost 60 percent."
* Of course, one huge negative to outfitting every cop with a camera is public privacy concerns. But even the American Civil Liberties Union, which is usually quick to protest anything that might infringe upon personal privacy, says that the notable drop in police brutality statistics is worth it:
Although we generally take a dim view of the proliferation of surveillance cameras in American life, police on-body cameras are different because of their potential to serve as a check against the abuse of power by police officers.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1337944/police-brutality-statistics-in-the-united-states-fell-by-60-percent-when-cops-wear-video-cameras/
Love, peace and the righteous fight, littlemissmartypants.
UJ.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Every single police officer in the nation should be required to wear a camera and mic on their shirt
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#2
It's probably the simplest and most cost effective way to try to get a handle on
RKP5637
Aug 2014
#20
There is this as evidence "Police Brutality Statistics In The United States Fell By 60 Percent When"
Uncle Joe
Aug 2014
#66
"Protect And Serve" Only Applies To The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks
cantbeserious
Aug 2014
#13
Well said!!! We are watching IMO something occurring akin to the SS during WWII. The point you
RKP5637
Aug 2014
#21
And when they hold positions of power and authority they want to be idolized and worshipped.
stillwaiting
Aug 2014
#32
"Failure to comply" will be the catch-all excuse for violent police assault on a citizen
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#36
Police shoot unarmed black teen dead...let's calm down and investigate further
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#37
Exactly. That difference tells us all we need to know about such commenters. nt
redqueen
Aug 2014
#42
here we go, I knew it would be long until a low post count apologist shows up......
bowens43
Aug 2014
#30
What else can you say when you shoot an unarmed teenager: "He was trying to take my weapon!"
alcibiades_mystery
Aug 2014
#61