Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Question for the experts at DU [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)53. Worked for Poppy while minding Pruneface.

So, it would seem likely, given Dim Son's ten-gallon ego and half-pint head.

In the system, Smirko gets the glory and draws enough idiots who want to have a beer with him to the polls to give election-stealing some plausibility. Meanwhile, Cheney does the dirty work and the thinkin'. It's a matter of record they both are cashing in the checks from Halliburton, Carlyle Group, UBS, etc., Big Time.
More from CAQ:
George Bush Takes Charge: The Uses of Counter-Terrorism
By Christopher Simpson
Covert Action Quarterly 58
EXCERPT...
NSDD 207. NATIONAL PROGRAM FOR COMBATTING TERRORISM, (TOP SECRET), JAN. 20,1986
This nine‑page directive was the "comprehensive presidential statement of US counter-terrorism policy" in effect during both the Reagan and Bush administrations, according to an NSC deposition filed in US District Court. It formalized the recommendations of Vice President Bush's Task Force on Combatting Terrorism (NSDD 179). Washington's announced policy, both in public forums and in classified orders such as this one, was that the US government would make "no concessions (to guerrillas) ... pay no ransoms, nor permit release of prisoners or agree to other conditions that could serve to encourage additional terrorism."
In fact, of course, President Reagan, VP Bush, and others had already engineered a series of concessions to secure release of hostages in what would come to be called the Iran‑Contra affair.
From the standpoint of broad policy, this directive covered much of the same ground as NSDD 138, signed the previous April. In addition to the "no concessions" pledge, the US government asserted that it would "take measures to protect our citizens" (preemptive action); "make every legal effort to ... prosecute terrorists" (later acknowledged to include seizure of foreign nationals abroad for prosecution in the US); pay substantial rewards for information concerning guerrilla activity; and ensure that states that support anti‑US guerrillas "will not be allowed to do so without consequence."
NSDD 207'S innovation lay in its new administrative measures to implement the broad policies. It created an Anti‑Terrorism Assistance Program within the government, ordered new restrictions on the Freedom of Information Act, and renewed efforts to pass new emergency powers legislation developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which would authorize declaration of martial law in the US during "emergencies" announced by the president.
The directive authorized creation of a "proposed organization" within the US government specializing in anti‑guerrilla intelligence gathering, paramilitary operations, and rescue techniques. The existence, budget, tactics, leaders, and personnel of the group were intended to remain classified. Other measures included: authorization of an FBI and Immigration and Naturalization Service campaign to review the immigration status of political suspects in the US; preparation of legal arguments designed to justify various US responses to guerrillas, including use of deadly force and unilateral military operations abroad; and creation of specialized tactics, equipment, and squads of trained paramilitary operatives useful for striking at guerrilla targets.
CONTINUED...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Poppy Bush told FBI that's where he was and reported treasonous ''hearsay'' AFTER the fact.
Octafish
Aug 2014
#46
Bush ran against Reagan in primary as TPTB chosen one. Reagan was always in the way.
blm
Aug 2014
#18
That's interesting, I don't remember this factoid. Who did Reagan want for VP, I wonder?
2banon
Aug 2014
#48
There's been a lot written about it over the years. This is same incident that Alexander Haig
tritsofme
Aug 2014
#5
Conveniently out of town. Remember Sec State Haig, ''I'm in control here'' from the White House
Octafish
Aug 2014
#22
I need to ask one of those stupid questions: What does BFEE stand for. I know who it stands for
jwirr
Aug 2014
#37
I had the bush family figured out but did not know the ee. Thank you. Made me smile before I hit
jwirr
Aug 2014
#43
Is that another way of saying that you were not presented with these facts?
MrMickeysMom
Aug 2014
#40