Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thomas Frank calls out blind partisanship by Dems [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)103. I am NOT a "conservative" ...
But two tactics that "the left" promote that I find less than optimal are: 1) the insistence on focusing on economics, rather than social matters; and 2) the seemingly "I want everything, right now", rather than building on gradual social change.
In the first case, I disagree because it works against my political interest, as such a focus leaves me (and all non-straight, non-white males) in the same relative position. In the later case, I disagree because I am a student of history and that history informs us that lasting social change comes as the result of frustratingly small, incremental steps.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm off Warren since she passively announced her position on the Gaza situation
AlbertCat
Aug 2014
#34
No mention, sleight or otherwise, was made of or about atheists, so any insult perceived by
ballyhoo
Aug 2014
#73
I am superior to my God, and that is who I continue reinforcing allegiance to. While
ballyhoo
Aug 2014
#78
So Then the GOP Wins and Doubles Aid to Israel, but Your Conscience is Clean
AndyTiedye
Aug 2014
#84
If H. Clinton-Sachs runs, then all bets are off. It won't be on those of us that won't vote for her
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#94
That depends on the importance of the issue, doesn't it?? And THIS is a VERY important issue. I am
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#92
I would imagine the vast majority of the electorate isn't aware that the number one
octoberlib
Aug 2014
#46
when 10s of thousands of young and old were involved in the occupy movement
questionseverything
Aug 2014
#52
It took a Civil War and millions dying to effect the other. That would be like comparing it to a
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#8
You mistake what I said. I just used that as a comparison, not a suggestion for a strategy.
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#87
What exactly in my response motivates you? Because I feel insulted and condescended to?
2banon
Aug 2014
#41
Certainly you're intelligent enough to know very well there's a hell of a lot more to it than that.
2banon
Aug 2014
#55
I agree with you re: the party and the left when it comes to social issues.
historylovr
Aug 2014
#60
Why do you not eludicate what you mean by 'tactics'. What 'tactics' do liberals have that you
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2014
#63
one side is markedly better than the other; and no criticism of the leadership can be tolerated.
AlbertCat
Aug 2014
#31
Some of this is the Democrats bragging that they can make Wall Street happier than Republicans.
Spitfire of ATJ
Aug 2014
#64
democrats sold their soles to wall street after reagan. BIZNESS FRENDLEE.
pansypoo53219
Aug 2014
#67
THIS. The best thing I've read here in a while. Wasserman-Schultz and Schumer can suck it.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#72
"dreadful news like this should be rocket fuel. For the Dems, however, it hasn’t been."
WorseBeforeBetter
Aug 2014
#77
The White House is Only as Much of a "Bully Pulpit" as the Media Allows it to Be
AndyTiedye
Aug 2014
#97
The Democrats get campaign contributions from corporations too, no real mystery here.
Dustlawyer
Aug 2014
#96
Huge K&R! The most important vote we have today is our money and our time.
raouldukelives
Aug 2014
#100