Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My take on Hillary Clinton's motives in breaking with Obama on foreign policy [View all]karynnj
(60,949 posts)46. The President has, if anything, favored her over Joe Biden and everyone else
He did not have to do the photo op where he had the joint interview when she was leaving - where they acted as equals.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My take on Hillary Clinton's motives in breaking with Obama on foreign policy [View all]
karynnj
Aug 2014
OP
She is more big business and big bank, at least she and Bill were in Arkansas
LiberalArkie
Aug 2014
#33
Except her voting record is not on corporations first, more for the consumer.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#34
Either 1 or 2 she's wrong for the country. My guess more sell out less principle
on point
Aug 2014
#4
It's one and two. And here's three: she's totally shallow on foreign policy, she spent
TwilightGardener
Aug 2014
#6
She was too young to vote for Goldwater. She campaigned for McCarthy in 1968,
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#36
She campaigned for Rockefeller in 1968. She worked at the Republican National Convention that year.
ieoeja
Aug 2014
#51
She was raised in a GOP home but has campaigned for Democrats since voting age.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#55
I guess you should take a look at more than the few threads you have admitted to checking
davidpdx
Aug 2014
#59
She has to prove she has bigger balls than any man and by god, given the chance, she will do it.
CBGLuthier
Aug 2014
#10
Who cares if Clinton picks some "moderate liberal"? The person would be a powerless token
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#35
The vice Presidency is no springboard to the big chair save via death, 2024 is not even
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#38
It's because she's so weak on domestic policy/economics. She *needs* the election to be about
Romulox
Aug 2014
#20
IMO she is a politician and will do/say what is necessary, remember "Landing under fire?"
HereSince1628
Aug 2014
#21