Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: From "I f*cking love science" [View all]pinto
(106,886 posts)30. from the WWF
http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/endangered_species/elephants/african_elephants/afelephants_threats/
Threats to African elephants
The two main historical factors behind the decline of African elephants demand for ivory and changes in land-use still pose a serious threat to the species.
Most range states do not have adequate capacity to protect and manage their herds. If conservation action is not forthcoming, elephants may become locally extinct in some parts of Africa within 50 years.
Still poached for ivory and meat
In the early 1970s, demand for ivory soared and the amount of ivory leaving Africa rose to levels not seen since the start of the century. Most of the ivory leaving Africa was taken illegally and over 80% of all the raw ivory traded came from poached elephants.
This illegal trade was largely responsible for reducing the African elephant population from 3-5 million to current levels. In the 1980s, for example, an estimated 100,000 elephants were being killed per year and up to 80% of herds were lost in some regions.
The poaching was generally well-organized and difficult to control because of the availability of automatic weapons.
Ivory ban introduced
In 1989, CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) banned international trade in ivory to combat this massive illegal trade.
As the ban came into force in 1990, some of the major ivory markets were eliminated. As a result, some countries in Africa experienced a steep decline in illegal killing, especially where elephants were adequately protected. This allowed some elephant populations to recover.
But poaching continues
However, in countries where wildlife management authorities are chronically under-funded, poaching still appears to be a chronic, significant problem. Thriving but unmonitored domestic ivory markets continue in a number of states, some of which have few elephants of their own remaining. These markets fuel the illegal international trade.
Moreover, increasing land use pressures on elephant range (see below), declining law enforcement budgets, and continuing poaching pressure for bush meat as well as ivory, have kept illegal killing of elephants widespread in some regions.
Unequal distribution of elephants means different opinions on conservation
Considerable debate surrounds elephant conservation, largely because of the varying status of elephant populations in different range countries.
Some people, mainly in southern African countries where elephant populations are increasing, consider that a legal and controlled ivory trade could bring substantial economic benefits to Africa without jeopardizing the conservation of the species. Others are opposed to it because corruption and lack of law enforcement in some countries would make it difficult to control the trade.
Threats to African elephants
The two main historical factors behind the decline of African elephants demand for ivory and changes in land-use still pose a serious threat to the species.
Most range states do not have adequate capacity to protect and manage their herds. If conservation action is not forthcoming, elephants may become locally extinct in some parts of Africa within 50 years.
Still poached for ivory and meat
In the early 1970s, demand for ivory soared and the amount of ivory leaving Africa rose to levels not seen since the start of the century. Most of the ivory leaving Africa was taken illegally and over 80% of all the raw ivory traded came from poached elephants.
This illegal trade was largely responsible for reducing the African elephant population from 3-5 million to current levels. In the 1980s, for example, an estimated 100,000 elephants were being killed per year and up to 80% of herds were lost in some regions.
The poaching was generally well-organized and difficult to control because of the availability of automatic weapons.
Ivory ban introduced
In 1989, CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) banned international trade in ivory to combat this massive illegal trade.
As the ban came into force in 1990, some of the major ivory markets were eliminated. As a result, some countries in Africa experienced a steep decline in illegal killing, especially where elephants were adequately protected. This allowed some elephant populations to recover.
But poaching continues
However, in countries where wildlife management authorities are chronically under-funded, poaching still appears to be a chronic, significant problem. Thriving but unmonitored domestic ivory markets continue in a number of states, some of which have few elephants of their own remaining. These markets fuel the illegal international trade.
Moreover, increasing land use pressures on elephant range (see below), declining law enforcement budgets, and continuing poaching pressure for bush meat as well as ivory, have kept illegal killing of elephants widespread in some regions.
Unequal distribution of elephants means different opinions on conservation
Considerable debate surrounds elephant conservation, largely because of the varying status of elephant populations in different range countries.
Some people, mainly in southern African countries where elephant populations are increasing, consider that a legal and controlled ivory trade could bring substantial economic benefits to Africa without jeopardizing the conservation of the species. Others are opposed to it because corruption and lack of law enforcement in some countries would make it difficult to control the trade.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
From what I've heard, poachers only take the tusks and leave the carcass where it lays.
pinto
Aug 2014
#18
I'd LOVE to see poachers shot through the skull before they can murder elephants
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2014
#19
You mean it'd make more sense financially to support photo tourism vs shoot to kill tourism?
uppityperson
Aug 2014
#7
It has worked for gorillas, to make more money preserving them than killing them
uppityperson
Aug 2014
#10
Same situation and outcome. A few animals remain so how to maximize profits.
uppityperson
Aug 2014
#15
The focus should be on the ignorant assholes who pay the money in the first place.
arcane1
Aug 2014
#11