Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinto

(106,886 posts)
30. from the WWF
Tue Aug 12, 2014, 07:27 PM
Aug 2014
http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/endangered_species/elephants/african_elephants/afelephants_threats/

Threats to African elephants

The two main historical factors behind the decline of African elephants – demand for ivory and changes in land-use – still pose a serious threat to the species.

Most range states do not have adequate capacity to protect and manage their herds. If conservation action is not forthcoming, elephants may become locally extinct in some parts of Africa within 50 years.

Still poached for ivory and meat

In the early 1970s, demand for ivory soared and the amount of ivory leaving Africa rose to levels not seen since the start of the century. Most of the ivory leaving Africa was taken illegally and over 80% of all the raw ivory traded came from poached elephants.

This illegal trade was largely responsible for reducing the African elephant population from 3-5 million to current levels. In the 1980s, for example, an estimated 100,000 elephants were being killed per year and up to 80% of herds were lost in some regions.

The poaching was generally well-organized and difficult to control because of the availability of automatic weapons.

Ivory ban introduced

In 1989, CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) banned international trade in ivory to combat this massive illegal trade.

As the ban came into force in 1990, some of the major ivory markets were eliminated. As a result, some countries in Africa experienced a steep decline in illegal killing, especially where elephants were adequately protected. This allowed some elephant populations to recover.

But poaching continues

However, in countries where wildlife management authorities are chronically under-funded, poaching still appears to be a chronic, significant problem. Thriving but unmonitored domestic ivory markets continue in a number of states, some of which have few elephants of their own remaining. These markets fuel the illegal international trade.

Moreover, increasing land use pressures on elephant range (see below), declining law enforcement budgets, and continuing poaching pressure for bush meat as well as ivory, have kept illegal killing of elephants widespread in some regions.

Unequal distribution of elephants means different opinions on conservation

Considerable debate surrounds elephant conservation, largely because of the varying status of elephant populations in different range countries.

Some people, mainly in southern African countries where elephant populations are increasing, consider that a legal and controlled ivory trade could bring substantial economic benefits to Africa without jeopardizing the conservation of the species. Others are opposed to it because corruption and lack of law enforcement in some countries would make it difficult to control the trade.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

From "I f*cking love science" [View all] geardaddy Aug 2014 OP
Kickin' it for Ain't That The Truth! In_The_Wind Aug 2014 #1
or a rhino horn or whale bones Duppers Aug 2014 #2
Exactly! geardaddy Aug 2014 #17
or plastic MisterP Aug 2014 #23
Plastic... which is killing us all! n/t ReRe Aug 2014 #39
Unless... logicatwork Aug 2014 #3
So that excuses it? LordGlenconner Aug 2014 #4
From what I've heard, poachers only take the tusks and leave the carcass where it lays. pinto Aug 2014 #18
Who are the poachers? logicatwork Aug 2014 #27
"Any relaxation in the enforcement of legislation..." pinto Aug 2014 #28
Yes thank you. logicatwork Aug 2014 #29
from the WWF pinto Aug 2014 #30
You prove my point. logicatwork Aug 2014 #35
Logic...not working... blackspade Aug 2014 #38
:) logicatwork Aug 2014 #42
I'd LOVE to see poachers shot through the skull before they can murder elephants DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2014 #19
I'm with you LordGlenconner Aug 2014 #20
Unless someone can make money off it. Iggo Aug 2014 #21
No excuse. logicatwork Aug 2014 #5
Yes it is an excuse...if all the native animals are killed, what will they hunt? Tikki Aug 2014 #6
You mean it'd make more sense financially to support photo tourism vs shoot to kill tourism? uppityperson Aug 2014 #7
Yes, that would be a sustaining profit. Tikki Aug 2014 #8
They aren't. logicatwork Aug 2014 #9
It has worked for gorillas, to make more money preserving them than killing them uppityperson Aug 2014 #10
Different Animal logicatwork Aug 2014 #12
Same situation and outcome. A few animals remain so how to maximize profits. uppityperson Aug 2014 #15
The focus should be on the ignorant assholes who pay the money in the first place. arcane1 Aug 2014 #11
Kenyans? logicatwork Aug 2014 #13
Are you really that naive? LordGlenconner Aug 2014 #16
Hunters logicatwork Aug 2014 #24
Exceptions that prove the rule LordGlenconner Aug 2014 #25
Sorry it's long... logicatwork Aug 2014 #26
Hunting animals that are threatened or critically endangered LordGlenconner Aug 2014 #32
What then? logicatwork Aug 2014 #33
It's a fucking excuse LordGlenconner Aug 2014 #14
Except, unless, it's just that... Iggo Aug 2014 #22
when these intelligent animals are extinct Duppers Aug 2014 #37
Poachers go f*ck yourselves, then eat sh!t and die Blue Owl Aug 2014 #31
+1 million n/t geardaddy Aug 2014 #36
+2 million ReRe Aug 2014 #40
K and R bigwillq Aug 2014 #34
... Duppers Aug 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From "I f*cking love...»Reply #30