Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
21. 2 out of 3
Mon Apr 9, 2012, 02:52 PM
Apr 2012

Prosecutors are not dictators, not even petty tyrants.

TRUE

They are subject to and must answer to the will of the people.

FALSE, at least in a civilized society. Prosecuters are sworn to operate dispassionately in terms of the law, not to respond to public passions. The fact that prosecuters are often, in practice, political hacks and persons of low character who answer to the will of the people and thereby dishonor their obligations does not mean it is right to be so.

The people have a right to know what the basis of her decision not to send the case to a Grand Jury was.

FALSE. There are all sorts of things related to an investigation or prosecution that the public does not have a right to know in real time.

______________

In general, I would recommend a study of lynching as an institution. A typical lynching was not a mob grabbing someone on the street. That happened, of course, but that's not what lynching was when it was epidemic. Lynching was typically a mob storming city hall and grabbing an accused person from police custody to hang the accused without benefit of trial.

The motive was invariably that the people felt the police and prosecuters and courts were not sufficiently responsive to what the public wanted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Evidence? n/t jschurchin Apr 2012 #1
Are you asking me or telling me? Care to elaborate? - n/t coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #2
Neither. jschurchin Apr 2012 #3
Or that she has enough facts to indict without needing a Grand Jury uppityperson Apr 2012 #4
Grand Jury required for Murder cases. CAPHAVOC Apr 2012 #8
Are you saying that we now know Zimmerman will not be tried for murder? Maraya1969 Apr 2012 #10
only first degree or felony murder cases NoGOPZone Apr 2012 #11
Not true. nt Ruby the Liberal Apr 2012 #13
Please don't misinform. Grand Jury is required for 1st degree. ScreamingMeemie Apr 2012 #14
Only 1st degree murder charges require the use of a grand jury Kaleva Apr 2012 #19
Oh really? Not trying to pick a fight. My point is only that prosecutors are public servants, not coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #16
evidence? how about a dead 17 year old? spanone Apr 2012 #18
This decision does not mean what you seem to think it means cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #5
I think charges will likely be filed by her. Cali_Democrat Apr 2012 #9
I understand that the prosecutor can still bring charges. I want to know specifically why coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #15
2 out of 3 cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #21
Here in Los Angeles, the County District Attorney must run for election every 4 years. The current coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #23
Good post. n/t Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #34
The grand jury indictment is not required to prosecute in this case Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #22
Will you adhere to that position if Corey decides when all is said and done not to charge Zimmerman coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #24
If they do, I'm sure they'll release a report Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #33
Maybe you shouldn't know pipoman Apr 2012 #6
Hunh? I'm not a resident of Florida so you are right that I technically do coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #17
There are lots of things that taxpayers have no right to know. Igel Apr 2012 #20
Same question I've posted elsewhere I'll post here: what if Corey decides not to coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #25
This isn't just going away pipoman Apr 2012 #27
Suspects cannot be compelled to "discuss" or "talk to" the Feds. I'll repeat my coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #29
Won't have to, there will be a release, just not in the time it takes pipoman Apr 2012 #32
No the tax payers do not have a right to know, pipoman Apr 2012 #28
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree. I want to know why Corey, in her coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #31
Delete me. I just read about it. Maraya1969 Apr 2012 #7
You and I know broad facts. Hopefully the test of prosecution's a little higher Bucky Apr 2012 #12
You don't need a grand jury to indict. nt hack89 Apr 2012 #26
I might be one of those wait 48 hours people but i am gettin impatient. slampoet Apr 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Repeat after me: Why aren...»Reply #21