Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)

7. Concur. In this case I think its just personal animus.

Reply to randome (Reply #6)

Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:43 PM

Aug 2014

I'm giving Starbucks the benefit of the doubt (for the time being);
but I've been approached by a manager at another location

who singled only me out - to make a "table rent" policy statement.

On that day (just days ago) he said that he noticed I made multiple purchases - but it wasn't enough.

We'll see!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Starbucks New ANTI-Homeless Person Policy [View all] laserhaas Aug 2014 OP

I think you'd have more luck suing Starbucks than Romney. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #1

Actually - I'm winning (somewhat) - there's much action in my case. laserhaas Aug 2014 #2

Well, good luck with both. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #4

Thanks. Most don't realize it (yet); but Mitt's running again in 2016 laserhaas Aug 2014 #5

By winning, do you mean losing? Victor Ward Aug 2014 #9

I must be winning something. Trolls keep coming out attacking me - even in the interims. laserhaas Aug 2014 #10

Inexplicably - the Youtube link in "Bust Out" refuses to work. Does anyone know why. laserhaas Aug 2014 #3

I suppose it depends on the manager. randome Aug 2014 #6

Concur. In this case I think its just personal animus. laserhaas Aug 2014 #7

There;s nothing wrong with table rent policy's - If they're ubiquitous. laserhaas Aug 2014 #8