Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 02:09 PM Aug 2014

Odd Notes From Ferguson Police Chief Jackson's Press Conference (Thurs Aug 14) [View all]

For those not close to a teevee, the Police Chief of Ferguson, Thomas Jackson, gave a short press conference around noon local time. Here are some of my observations, including mostly the odd moments of the press conference.

1) Shushing his Subordinate - At one point, Jackson was asked about the two journalists who had been arrested in the McDonald's last night. He hemmed and hawed awkwardly, then one of his subordinates grabbed a mic and said something like "They were upset because they wanted to be on television..." at which point Jackson literally pushed him away and shushed him.

2) "We're Reviewing that Today Again" - On naming the officer who shot and killed Michael Brown, the Jackson had a few interesting things to say: a) He absolutely denied that the person named by Anonymous earlier today was that officer, but then suggested that the person named was actually an officer, which is different from what he'd said earlier, saying something like "The officer they named who was not involved," b) He hemmed and hawed oddly when another name - Gary - was thrown at him, saying "No comment" to that name (why deny the one but not the other?), c) most importantly, he mentioned that they were reviewing the decision "again today." (see 3)).

3) Reviewing the Decision not the Release the Name - Jackson made some very odd remarks about naming the officer involved, saying "We're reviewing that again today." He said that he had mentioned two circumstances in which he'd release the name: forced to by a judge, or if the officer was charged. But he also said that a third condition applied: that he could change his mind on a day-to-day basis, and today was a new day! It was a remarkable thing to say. He then implied that he would be having a meeting on that question today, "this afternoon." And promised "more on that!"

On point three, I think Jackson is under great pressure to release the name of this officer, and that some of the pressure is coming from the Justice Department / White House. Notice that in Obama's statement (which was, let's face it, underwhelming at best) kept mentioning an "open and transparent investigation." I think that was code for "release the name," and that this is coming down at Jackson from federal and from Nixon.

In any case, a very odd conference indeed.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A bunch of yokels who don't know what they're doing frazzled Aug 2014 #1
Cheif had have to been told to stop fucking with journalists, but his underling had to get a jab in bettyellen Aug 2014 #2
I'd just like a printed transcript, as none seem available yet. VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #3
Me too- he seemed confident at first, but increasingly rattled as the questioning intensified. bettyellen Aug 2014 #5
It doesn't sound very professional. arcane1 Aug 2014 #4
he got that talking point (wanting to get on TV) CatWoman Aug 2014 #9
god forbid REAL journalism or activism makes it to broadcast, right? can't cover up corruption and bettyellen Aug 2014 #14
MSNBC video - don't know if it's the whole thing... cui bono Aug 2014 #11
Thanks for posting the color commentary - I had tuned out as soon as Pres. Obama VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #6
MSNBC video - don't know if it's the whole thing... cui bono Aug 2014 #10
Thank you for this. Jackson has got to go. What a pathetic excuse. VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #15
Somebody should have asked when the Grand Jury was meeting. Historic NY Aug 2014 #7
That chief is either not in control of his officers and should be fired, or NV Whino Aug 2014 #8
When asked if the cop was named "Gary" he froze... winstars Aug 2014 #12
When asked if the cop was named "Gary" he froze ghawtho1 Aug 2014 #16
Sounds like Jackson is Stonewalling. lpbk2713 Aug 2014 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Odd Notes From Ferguson P...