Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Supreme Court Agrees to Reconsider Citizens United [View all]
(Newser) The Supreme Court has agreed to take a case that justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer say will give it a chance to rethink its infamous Citizens United v. FEC decision. The court is being asked to look into a Montana Supreme Court decision stating that its law restricting corporate election spending in state elections is fine, because it "arises from Montana history," UPI reports. Essentially, Montana is arguing that Citizens United only applies to federal laws and elections, not state ones.
Two Montana corporations are asking the court to make a summary judgment to the contrary; their lead counsel argues that otherwise, "free speech will be seriously harmed," because states anywhere could "ban core political speech." But Ginsburg and Breyer earlier wrote that the case "will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway."
http://www.newser.com/story/143671/supreme-court-agrees-to-reconsider-citizens-united.html
Two Montana corporations are asking the court to make a summary judgment to the contrary; their lead counsel argues that otherwise, "free speech will be seriously harmed," because states anywhere could "ban core political speech." But Ginsburg and Breyer earlier wrote that the case "will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway."
http://www.newser.com/story/143671/supreme-court-agrees-to-reconsider-citizens-united.html
p.s. Be sure to read the UPI article too via the hyperlink in the first paragraph.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supreme Corporation of the United States will use this case to strengthen it
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Apr 2012
#4
A better headline would be: Supreme Court Gets a Chance to Extend Citizens United to State Level.
Fool Count
Apr 2012
#10
Unless the Dems hope another jackass ruling will make the SCOTUS a hot topic in this fall's
McCamy Taylor
Apr 2012
#26
SCOTUS conservatives doing the right thing? Ha! Never happen. They don't give a shit
neverforget
Apr 2012
#12
And a tribute to the movement state by state to nail down their AG's on this issue:
freshwest
Apr 2012
#18
BS The Gang of 5 will use it to usurp state laws. Next election Super pacs in China will be funding
McCamy Taylor
Apr 2012
#25
The CU case was about a corporation that made a movie and wanted to distribute it.
eallen
Apr 2012
#58
I think that legal constructs like corporations should be limited by charter to what their reach and
TheKentuckian
Apr 2012
#39
The history of the newspaper industry rebuts your claim about news being non-profit, non-revenue
onenote
Apr 2012
#41
Me neither. He has never recused himself when he has had a conflict of interest.
sabrina 1
Apr 2012
#31
Too bad this thread wasn't about a dead artist, a dead religious figure, or a bad jury decision.
Major Hogwash
Apr 2012
#32