Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: re - Thomas Kincade: I do NOT think it's okay to dance on somebody's grave just because [View all]progressoid
(53,130 posts)23. Yes, crimes.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/mar/25/arts.artsnews
...
But now the world has grown even more "unsympathetic and complex" for the artist, who describes himself as a devout Christian and has trademarked his "Painter of Light" soubriquet. In court documents and other testimony, he has been accused of sexual harassment, fraudulent business practices and bizarre incidents of drunkenness including a habit of "ritual territory marking" that involves urinating in public places.
A court-appointed arbitration panel has ruled in favour of two former owners of Kinkade-branded galleries, ordering his company to pay them $860,000 (£500,000) for breaching "the covenant of good faith and dealing" and failing to disclose pertinent business information.
...
Kinkade won two other claims, but six more are pending, including one from a Michigan man who says he lost $3m in assets, along with his marriage and most of his possessions, after the galleries he owned went broke. Other former employees and associates of the artist - in court testimony and in interviews with the Los Angeles Times - recounted how he had fondled a woman's breasts at a company event, and lashed out at an ex-colleague's wife who tried to help him when he fell from a bar stool.
Two former employees, Terry Sheppard and John Dandois, told the panel of further examples of Kinkade's unpredictable behaviour: bringing disorder to a Las Vegas performance by the illusionists Siegfried and Roy by repeatedly yelling the word "codpiece" from his audience seat, and urinating in public - in an elevator and on a model of Winnie the Pooh at a Disneyland hotel. "This one's for you, Walt," Mr Sheppard claimed the artist said as he did so.
...
But now the world has grown even more "unsympathetic and complex" for the artist, who describes himself as a devout Christian and has trademarked his "Painter of Light" soubriquet. In court documents and other testimony, he has been accused of sexual harassment, fraudulent business practices and bizarre incidents of drunkenness including a habit of "ritual territory marking" that involves urinating in public places.
A court-appointed arbitration panel has ruled in favour of two former owners of Kinkade-branded galleries, ordering his company to pay them $860,000 (£500,000) for breaching "the covenant of good faith and dealing" and failing to disclose pertinent business information.
...
Kinkade won two other claims, but six more are pending, including one from a Michigan man who says he lost $3m in assets, along with his marriage and most of his possessions, after the galleries he owned went broke. Other former employees and associates of the artist - in court testimony and in interviews with the Los Angeles Times - recounted how he had fondled a woman's breasts at a company event, and lashed out at an ex-colleague's wife who tried to help him when he fell from a bar stool.
Two former employees, Terry Sheppard and John Dandois, told the panel of further examples of Kinkade's unpredictable behaviour: bringing disorder to a Las Vegas performance by the illusionists Siegfried and Roy by repeatedly yelling the word "codpiece" from his audience seat, and urinating in public - in an elevator and on a model of Winnie the Pooh at a Disneyland hotel. "This one's for you, Walt," Mr Sheppard claimed the artist said as he did so.
...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
re - Thomas Kincade: I do NOT think it's okay to dance on somebody's grave just because [View all]
Typical NYC Lib
Apr 2012
OP
Kinkade, not Kincaide. And those "fantasy fairy tale" settings were based on the Cotswolds in
highplainsdem
Apr 2012
#43
Do you pity this man? "It would positively be a relief to me to dig him up and throw stones at him"
REP
Apr 2012
#26
Since you are in NYC I hope you will venture out and go to the wonderful museums you
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#3
well, I don't celebrate anyone's death. For one thing, it is bad karma. Also, it doesn't sit right
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#9
A couple of weeks ago I got to see the full-length Renoirs at the Frick, a special exhibit.
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#73
self described pacifists cheering some painter's death.. the irony is fucking delicious...
dionysus
Apr 2012
#32
Or maybe people just want others to know the truth of what some people have done.
Hissyspit
Apr 2012
#28
He was a facile artist that decided to market a popular formula instead of create individual art.
Kablooie
Apr 2012
#39
Welcome to the new DU where Grave Dancing is never locked by a jury! Or fat jokes, etc.
Logical
Apr 2012
#41
It's mostly because of his crooked and deceptive business practices that I'm glad he's gone.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2012
#42
And then there's the unasked question about ALL the TK threads (including this one):
Typical NYC Lib
Apr 2012
#49
Betting your last sentence is true because he actually painted his first works himself
eridani
Apr 2012
#67
The fact that he was a horrid person aside, he literally stole everything he did,
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2012
#68