Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TrollBuster9090

(6,059 posts)
17. They'll probably modify #4 to claim that Brown 'struggled' with Wilson in an attempt to get his gun.
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 07:11 PM
Aug 2014

Since I'm willing to bet that Wilson didn't have any injuries.

However, the case will still hinge on the fact that Brown was shot several times from a distance. They'll probably claim that Wilson 'thought' Brown was pointing a weapon at him. (Which obviously makes no sense if you're going to claim that Brown was trying to get Wilson's gun. No need to do that if you're already armed. In which case they'll have to switch to the argument that Brown still had to get Wilson's gun away from him so Wilson couldn't shoot him.)

Yadda yadda.... I'm sure it will make no difference to a skitterish, spineless jury of non-blacks who would rather ere on the side of having a few innocent black teens dead on the sidewalk than run the 'risk' of having non-innocent black teens come through their bedroom window one night. That's the way things have worked for as long as I can remember.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

For #4 Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 #1
So many problems with that. First, it doesn't comport with what the witnesses say happened. morningfog Aug 2014 #2
The police are well on their way to trashing the credibility of the witnesses JJChambers Aug 2014 #5
Lists and rules are handy tools.....I like the new DU rule... FarPoint Aug 2014 #3
ROBBERY? Call it shoplifting because that's what it was Warpy Aug 2014 #4
Nope, the video clearly shows physical intimidation and force against the store clerk Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #6
He pushes the storekeeper out of his way Warpy Aug 2014 #8
Assault combined with theft = robbery, under the law. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #10
Your post had me thinking Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 #7
I wouldn't think so JJChambers Aug 2014 #9
No Cali_Democrat Aug 2014 #11
I doubt the confrontation ever got to the point of the officer explaining the reason for the stop JJChambers Aug 2014 #12
Wilson made it clear. He told him to get the fuck back on the curb. morningfog Aug 2014 #18
Even if we accept the logic of their narrative through step 4, I think there needs to be a step #5: VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #13
This thread is about the police narrative, not the truth. JJChambers Aug 2014 #14
Understood, and don't mean to be argumentative, merely to point out that, VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #15
This is todays official narrative. It will do for now............ wandy Aug 2014 #16
They'll probably modify #4 to claim that Brown 'struggled' with Wilson in an attempt to get his gun. TrollBuster9090 Aug 2014 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michael Brown Murder: The...»Reply #17