Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Strong Arm Robbery, My A**... [View all]pintobean
(18,101 posts)5. And it was explained in your thread.
Missouri law says it's robbery because of the assault and threat during the theft.
We can't pretend that the law doesn't exist, or that law enforcement shouldn't use proper terminology.
IronGate (1,587 posts)
68. According to MO. law,
yes he committed strong arm robbery, which is a class B felony.
Here are the relevant definitions from the Missouri criminal code:
(1) "Forcibly steals", a person "forcibly steals", and thereby commits robbery, when, in the course of stealing, as defined in section 570.030, he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person for the purpose of:
(a) Preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention thereof immediately after the taking
570.030. 1. A person commits the crime of stealing if he or she appropriates property or services of another with the purpose to deprive him or her thereof, either without his or her consent or by means of deceit or coercion.
569.030. 1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property.
But, that still doesn't justify the cop executing Mr. Brown.
68. According to MO. law,
yes he committed strong arm robbery, which is a class B felony.
Here are the relevant definitions from the Missouri criminal code:
(1) "Forcibly steals", a person "forcibly steals", and thereby commits robbery, when, in the course of stealing, as defined in section 570.030, he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person for the purpose of:
(a) Preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention thereof immediately after the taking
570.030. 1. A person commits the crime of stealing if he or she appropriates property or services of another with the purpose to deprive him or her thereof, either without his or her consent or by means of deceit or coercion.
569.030. 1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property.
But, that still doesn't justify the cop executing Mr. Brown.
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/10025393333#post68
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Robbery or Larceny in 2nd Degree and "Strong Arm" robbery are used interchangeably
Lee-Lee
Aug 2014
#9
I stand corrected. It doesn't make releasing this report any less sleazy and defamatory.
6000eliot
Aug 2014
#43
Execution is the appropriate punishment for grabbing an arm and stealing $49 of cigars
randys1
Aug 2014
#60
I thought sunshine laws are for governing bodies, not citizens who own their own security tapes.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#38
Is it common knowledge? I thought I was paying attention. Guess I missed the fact about warrants.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#44
But aren't sunshine laws applicable only to governing bodies? Not private owners of tapes?
ancianita
Aug 2014
#39
For that excuse to fly, they'd have to release the incident report for the shooting too
jeff47
Aug 2014
#54
Agreed. Which is why we shouldn't have even been told about this separate incident. nt
conservaphobe
Aug 2014
#17
+1. The video might explain the initial encounter with policeman, but not shooting him in the back.
Hoyt
Aug 2014
#35
I think the incident is relevant, although not a justification for shooting. And, it appears
Hoyt
Aug 2014
#104
Ummmm, parents have already acknowledged that it was their son in the video. nt.
IronGate
Aug 2014
#26
Each "side"? I think the cops dehumanized themselves when they started acting like violent, mindless
redqueen
Aug 2014
#64