Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: Texas Grand Jury Indicts Governor Rick Perry [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)144. Ah yes, time to claim it's different
DeLay denied having engaged in a conspiracy to launder money for the purpose of evading campaign finance laws in order to fund a political campaign. DeLay was a representative from one district, and never won a statewide election in Texas for anything.
Your argument is that no Republican in Texas could be convicted because at least one juror is likely to be a hardcore Republican.
Doesn't matter what crime is claimed. You were arguing at least one would refuse to convict.
Where did I say it was not possible for him to be convicted? Nowhere.
Well, you could start with re-reading your post number 89. Where you make an elaborate show claiming it's mathematically impossible for him to be convicted.
I am saying that he has a very persuasive justification defense.
He's free to try it. But his justification defense has to also explain why he decided to use extortion instead of using a legal mechanism to disqualify or remove the DA from office.
Imagine a police officer comes across a robbery suspect. And decides to shoot the suspect multiple times instead of arresting him. Even though the suspect was not a threat to the officer. The cop was just taking down a criminal, right? A very persuasive justification defense. There'd never be days upon days of protests over the incident.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's a special prosecutor from San Antonio presenting the case and he was appointed by the elder
TexasTowelie
Aug 2014
#125
And the reason you can tell you're wrong is politicians get convicted quite frequently.
jeff47
Aug 2014
#92
I guess we're all prophesying at this point. Some with more absolutism than others.
LanternWaste
Aug 2014
#81
Mr. Abbott is going to spend a lot of time having to defend himself against his association w/CPRIT
blogslut
Aug 2014
#113
I guess Perry can add another government agency to his list of things he would like to get rid of.
npk
Aug 2014
#82
So the DA who he wants to resign, and is withholding funds from, is also the DA who indicted him?
Calista241
Aug 2014
#94
Great news, always a positive to see political scum get washed down the drain
anti partisan
Aug 2014
#102