Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Darren Wilson isn't charged with murder, we will have normalized legal police murder. [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)57. Oh plez! If a citizen had done the exact same thing, they would be arrested immediately and
in jail while the investigators worked things out. If someone is suspected of a crime they go to jail.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Darren Wilson isn't charged with murder, we will have normalized legal police murder. [View all]
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
OP
I believe he will be charged with something when eyewitness accounts are corroborated by autopsy.
Hoyt
Aug 2014
#1
I think it was second degree murder. He pointed the gun and intentionally murdered him.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#13
How is that not First-Degree? Second-degree means with intent only to harm, not kill.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#39
"Premeditation" doesn't take long, especially when one chooses to shoot multiple times.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#89
In Missouri, 'first degree murder' requires 'deliberation upon the matter'...
PoliticAverse
Aug 2014
#78
"no matter how brief." Exactly. The cop DELIBERATED when he shot more than once.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#88
And the newspapers are free to post which ever responses they wish to promote their agenda. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#14
Of course, but why doesn't he get arrested? Why do they allow him to flee?
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#19
Hyperbole doesn't help. Neither does Jesse Jackson saying this was a 'state execution'.
randome
Aug 2014
#16
You call it "hyperbole" but I call it outrage and it's about time for a little.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#17
Internally, the police are working out Wilson's exculpatory narrative, probably. A common practice,
ancianita
Aug 2014
#21
Yes I am aware. I am objecting to the fact that police-persons can go free pending investigations
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#23
Well, what other legal remedy is there? He's out of sight to anyone. What more can be done?
ancianita
Aug 2014
#24
That sweeps aside current treatment practices of those 'in the line of duty.' You want something
ancianita
Aug 2014
#34
Most police agencies -most communities- are unprepared for something like this.
randome
Aug 2014
#43
I think you're missing the irony here: "the police will want to protect the officer and his family,"
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#59
Oh plez! If a citizen had done the exact same thing, they would be arrested immediately and
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#57
Yes, that's the difference. Police have one process, citizens have another because they're different
ancianita
Aug 2014
#99
"Someone working in security forces doesn't get civilian treatment under the law."
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#56
I'm aware, too. But your objection is against decades of civilian acceptance of policy, too.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#80
Things have changed over the last 30 years. I've seen it first hand. I want them to change back. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#97
What?? At no point were you talking militarization with me. You were talking about the 'irony' I
ancianita
Aug 2014
#107
AND I've actually recommended changes to prevent such police behavior in the future, IF you've read
ancianita
Aug 2014
#110
Accepted. And for the record I enjoy reading most of your posts and understand how these events
ancianita
Aug 2014
#113
If a citizen is S U S P E C T E D of a crime they go to jail. Not him. Not the "all-mighty" police
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#62
That's my point. You have not once pointed out any "apologist" language. Not once.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#117
Hm. I looked. Disagreement isn't attempted censoring. Thought you could enlighten me. Nice talk.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#121
Thanks.Relevant context here when mulling practical street consequences of inequality under the law
ancianita
Aug 2014
#26
The OP doesn't say a thing about "state execution". Where did you get that out
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#65
Those are all FACTS, though. Like other facts, they need to stand or fall on their own.
randome
Aug 2014
#93
Are you saying we don't know who pulled the trigger? How many times the victim was shot?
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#106
I've read elsewhere that the coroner's report won't be for a few weeks. Quite a delay.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#20
They already have, or DW would not feel that he can get away with this sh@#.
WCLinolVir
Aug 2014
#27
I understand but if a citizen did what he did, they'd be arrested while the
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#30
I don't think Zimmy was a good example. If he'd been black and the victim was white, he'd
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#70
A lawyer friend of mine says that common department practice is to put him on modified assignment.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#44
I think you are confusing "being watched carefully" with "being arrested." Will we get another
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#42
I think your opinion here is correct, but that doesn't make it a sound judgment by the dept.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#90
Years too late, been going on a long time...the difference is that his own group allowed
Rex
Aug 2014
#60
Most people are describing frustrated civilians, not prescribing authoritarianism.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#81
As lame as this probably sounds, Kelly Thomas' death was what first got me to tune in to
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#86
I agree that the Kelly Thomas case was horrible, but this case is a perfect example of a police
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#115
If it appears that a crime has been committed, the police will put citizens directly in jail and
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#96
I don't want mob rule. I want justice. Once again, if a citizen shot someone they'd be arrested
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#120
Since we are guessing what the other is "suggesting", are you suggesting that
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#130
I would love to see the "multiple reports". Do you count Sean Hannity as one? nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#136
Why does he get to be free during the investigation? If I shot someone that was unarmed, I'd be
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#127
now that this has gone to the justice department it will also involve violation of civil rights
still_one
Aug 2014
#103