Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Darren Wilson isn't charged with murder, we will have normalized legal police murder. [View all]Rex
(65,616 posts)64. Well the apologists stayed zipped lipped when the reporters were arrested.
Nothing they could disrupt the thread over on that one...they are like gun humpers imo...always willing to fall on their swords for something idiotic that the rest of us know is BS.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Darren Wilson isn't charged with murder, we will have normalized legal police murder. [View all]
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
OP
I believe he will be charged with something when eyewitness accounts are corroborated by autopsy.
Hoyt
Aug 2014
#1
I think it was second degree murder. He pointed the gun and intentionally murdered him.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#13
How is that not First-Degree? Second-degree means with intent only to harm, not kill.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#39
"Premeditation" doesn't take long, especially when one chooses to shoot multiple times.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#89
In Missouri, 'first degree murder' requires 'deliberation upon the matter'...
PoliticAverse
Aug 2014
#78
"no matter how brief." Exactly. The cop DELIBERATED when he shot more than once.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#88
And the newspapers are free to post which ever responses they wish to promote their agenda. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#14
Of course, but why doesn't he get arrested? Why do they allow him to flee?
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#19
Hyperbole doesn't help. Neither does Jesse Jackson saying this was a 'state execution'.
randome
Aug 2014
#16
You call it "hyperbole" but I call it outrage and it's about time for a little.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#17
Internally, the police are working out Wilson's exculpatory narrative, probably. A common practice,
ancianita
Aug 2014
#21
Yes I am aware. I am objecting to the fact that police-persons can go free pending investigations
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#23
Well, what other legal remedy is there? He's out of sight to anyone. What more can be done?
ancianita
Aug 2014
#24
That sweeps aside current treatment practices of those 'in the line of duty.' You want something
ancianita
Aug 2014
#34
Most police agencies -most communities- are unprepared for something like this.
randome
Aug 2014
#43
I think you're missing the irony here: "the police will want to protect the officer and his family,"
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#59
Oh plez! If a citizen had done the exact same thing, they would be arrested immediately and
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#57
Yes, that's the difference. Police have one process, citizens have another because they're different
ancianita
Aug 2014
#99
"Someone working in security forces doesn't get civilian treatment under the law."
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#56
I'm aware, too. But your objection is against decades of civilian acceptance of policy, too.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#80
Things have changed over the last 30 years. I've seen it first hand. I want them to change back. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#97
What?? At no point were you talking militarization with me. You were talking about the 'irony' I
ancianita
Aug 2014
#107
AND I've actually recommended changes to prevent such police behavior in the future, IF you've read
ancianita
Aug 2014
#110
Accepted. And for the record I enjoy reading most of your posts and understand how these events
ancianita
Aug 2014
#113
If a citizen is S U S P E C T E D of a crime they go to jail. Not him. Not the "all-mighty" police
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#62
That's my point. You have not once pointed out any "apologist" language. Not once.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#117
Hm. I looked. Disagreement isn't attempted censoring. Thought you could enlighten me. Nice talk.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#121
Thanks.Relevant context here when mulling practical street consequences of inequality under the law
ancianita
Aug 2014
#26
The OP doesn't say a thing about "state execution". Where did you get that out
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#65
Those are all FACTS, though. Like other facts, they need to stand or fall on their own.
randome
Aug 2014
#93
Are you saying we don't know who pulled the trigger? How many times the victim was shot?
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#106
I've read elsewhere that the coroner's report won't be for a few weeks. Quite a delay.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#20
They already have, or DW would not feel that he can get away with this sh@#.
WCLinolVir
Aug 2014
#27
I understand but if a citizen did what he did, they'd be arrested while the
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#30
I don't think Zimmy was a good example. If he'd been black and the victim was white, he'd
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#70
A lawyer friend of mine says that common department practice is to put him on modified assignment.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#44
I think you are confusing "being watched carefully" with "being arrested." Will we get another
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#42
I think your opinion here is correct, but that doesn't make it a sound judgment by the dept.
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#90
Years too late, been going on a long time...the difference is that his own group allowed
Rex
Aug 2014
#60
Most people are describing frustrated civilians, not prescribing authoritarianism.
ancianita
Aug 2014
#81
As lame as this probably sounds, Kelly Thomas' death was what first got me to tune in to
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#86
I agree that the Kelly Thomas case was horrible, but this case is a perfect example of a police
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#115
If it appears that a crime has been committed, the police will put citizens directly in jail and
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#96
I don't want mob rule. I want justice. Once again, if a citizen shot someone they'd be arrested
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#120
Since we are guessing what the other is "suggesting", are you suggesting that
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#130
I would love to see the "multiple reports". Do you count Sean Hannity as one? nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#136
Why does he get to be free during the investigation? If I shot someone that was unarmed, I'd be
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#127
now that this has gone to the justice department it will also involve violation of civil rights
still_one
Aug 2014
#103