Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Flyboy_451

(230 posts)
1. Depends on some possibilities...
Sat Aug 16, 2014, 04:04 PM
Aug 2014

If the officers were specifically told that they could not wear protective equipment and subsequently ordered into a situation that presented a valid concern for their safety, then yes, there is a problem that needs to be addressed.

If it was a voluntary act for each individual officer, then I don't see a problem.

Had I been one of the officers involved with the situation, I likely would have been in my standard motor officer uniform, complete with helmet, with the addition of an exterior ballistic vest with rifle plate installed. This is the minimum that I would view as prudent, given the situation. To expect officers to approach a potentially dangerous situation, with only minimal safety equipment is foolhardy and reckless.

While Ferguson may be vey Mayberry like on a normal day, this past week has been anything but normal, or Mayberry like.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Police in Ferguson & ...»Reply #1