Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here Is What Happened When Police STARTED WEARING CAMERAS In Rialto, California [View all]intaglio
(8,170 posts)41. In another thread I pointed out that, for some officers, cameras "break"
From the Albuquerque Journal
Manufacturer cant say why officers lapel camera didnt record
Albuquerque Police Department officer Jeremy Dears lapel video turned on and off numerous times the morning he shot and killed 19-year-old Mary Hawkes, according to a report released by Taser International Inc., which makes the cameras.
But its unclear why. The report states that investigators dont know if Dear powered it off or if the cable disconnected. None of the shooting was recorded, according to the report, despite the fact that the camera was turned on at some points.
Jeremy Dear shot and killed Hawkes in the early morning of April 21. Police said she was a suspected car thief and that she pulled a gun on officers after a short pursuit near Zuni and Wyoming. APD received criticism for the lack of video evidence, and Dear has a history of not recording his encounters with the public, according to his personnel file.
emphasis mine
Albuquerque Police Department officer Jeremy Dears lapel video turned on and off numerous times the morning he shot and killed 19-year-old Mary Hawkes, according to a report released by Taser International Inc., which makes the cameras.
But its unclear why. The report states that investigators dont know if Dear powered it off or if the cable disconnected. None of the shooting was recorded, according to the report, despite the fact that the camera was turned on at some points.
Jeremy Dear shot and killed Hawkes in the early morning of April 21. Police said she was a suspected car thief and that she pulled a gun on officers after a short pursuit near Zuni and Wyoming. APD received criticism for the lack of video evidence, and Dear has a history of not recording his encounters with the public, according to his personnel file.
emphasis mine
The excuse given by Deputy Chief William Roseman of Albuquerque PD is that the cables are designed to break. This completely ignores the point that the cable did not break but rather, somehow, disconnected and reconnected.
Then there is the other problem which actually occurred in Ferguson sometimes, entirely by chance of course, the wrong recording is saved
From the Daily Beast
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie
/snip
Indisputable evidence of what transpired in the cell might have been provided by a surveillance camera, but it turned out that the VHS video was recorded at 32 times normal speed.
It was like a blur, Schottel told The Daily Beast on Wednesday. You couldnt see anything.
The blur proved to be from 12 hours after the incident anyway. The cops had saved the wrong footage after Schottel asked them to preserve it.
/snip
Indisputable evidence of what transpired in the cell might have been provided by a surveillance camera, but it turned out that the VHS video was recorded at 32 times normal speed.
It was like a blur, Schottel told The Daily Beast on Wednesday. You couldnt see anything.
The blur proved to be from 12 hours after the incident anyway. The cops had saved the wrong footage after Schottel asked them to preserve it.
Thanks to justiceischeap for the OP where I found this second report
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here Is What Happened When Police STARTED WEARING CAMERAS In Rialto, California [View all]
Segami
Aug 2014
OP
It is pretty appalling how unintelligent some of the detectives are in my city.
wildeyed
Aug 2014
#6
"But I guess if you recruit for average or below intelligence out of the box, there is no one who is
tecelote
Aug 2014
#23
It's called accountability. I think the incredible statistics above speak volumes.
libdem4life
Aug 2014
#8
I like this, but wish to point out that in Los Angeles, the cameras were disabled
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#54
I bet it's saved some lives too. Wilson eg, might have thought twice before gunning down an
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#40
I wonder if they should consider making the cameras on the patrol cars more visible then?
cstanleytech
Aug 2014
#42
The jury is in, the cameras are effective at curbing law enforcement abuses.
Enthusiast
Aug 2014
#45
This sounds like a no-brainer. Evidence presented in court would have video back up.
McCamy Taylor
Aug 2014
#46
It's hysterical that quantum theory is used here to support the use of cameras by cops!
Chemisse
Aug 2014
#47
10 years until the Courts turn this against the general population, mandating wearing cameras/mic's
blkmusclmachine
Aug 2014
#59