Indiana BLACK grandmother suffers violent SWAT raid after a neighbor uses her wireless internet

[Trillo]

37. Yes, he did! I'll quote him for you in this post.

The poster was defending the police assumption that an IP address was tied to a person. and that the police response was reasonable.

You just wrote,
"What he said is that the IP address is tied to an address, and that IS the truth."

No, the poster above, wrote, and this is copy & paste,
"IP address reveals the poster's location to be at Physical Address X". Note his words, "poster's location".

That phrase may not be clear to you, but it's really clear to me. The court cases have basically said that an IP address is not tied to a person (in this discussion, "poster's&quot .

It may seem like a silly parsing of words to you, but it also seems to me you have misread his precise words. I'm not the only one that called him on that post.

Then he tells me, "Where do you get this '200' garbage". I wrote "two" not "200", a couple of magnitudes off. But you claim I'm the one baiting?

I'm outta here.