Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: re the store video: could the "altercation" have been over ID? [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,426 posts)8. Sorry - Johnson - the other person in the video tape. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You are aware, I trust, that the question of whether Mr. Brown stole anything or (to
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#12
"There's actually an assertion that he.......assaulted no one." He DID assault the store clerk.
WillowTree
Aug 2014
#19
Well, excuse me, but if the store clerk was illegally detaining Mr. Brown, his actions
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#21
But he had paid for the merchandise. So the 'stop' was not for failure to pay, now was it?
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#27
"Whitewashing what happened in the store"??? You are aware that it's an open question whether
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#45
DU appears as a paragon of reason compared to venues like Yahoo.com. I happened to
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#48
If my little speculation is correct I would feel he was a little more justified in that behavior
Kali
Aug 2014
#22
If Brown did not step out the door with goods for which he had not exchanged cash or
VanGoghRocks
Aug 2014
#25
That's what I noticed right away. Brown was at the checkout counter, but the dialogue
R B Garr
Aug 2014
#37