Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
17. Here's how Monsanto arranges for a FDA pass to poison the planet with their putrid GMO shit.
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 01:03 AM
Apr 2012
Labeling Issues, Revolving Doors, rBGH, Bribery and Monsanto

snip

But What was going on behind the scenes? "The FDA's pro-rBGH activities make more sense in light of conflicts of interest between the FDA and the Monsanto corporation. Michael R. Taylor, the FDA's deputy commissioner for policy, wrote the FDA's rBGH labelling guidelines. The guidelines, announced in February 1994, virtually prohibited dairy corporations from making any real distinction between products produced with and without rBGH. To keep rBGH-milk from being "stigmatized" in the marketplace, the FDA announced that labels on non-rBGH products must state that there is no difference between rBGH and the naturally occurring hormone. In March 1994, Taylor was publicly exposed as a former lawyer for the Monsanto corporation for seven years. While working for Monsanto, Taylor had prepared a memo for the company as to whether or not it would be constitutional for states to erect labelling laws concerning rBGH dairy products. In other words. Taylor helped Monsanto figure out whether or not the corporation could sue states or companies that wanted to tell the public that their products were free of Monsanto's drug" [16]. Rachel's Hazardous Waste News adds a few details, "It is no accident that the FDA and Monsanto are speaking with one voice on this issue. The FDA official responsible for the agency's labeling policy, Michael R. Taylor, is a former partner of King & Spaulding, the Washington, D.C. law firm that has brought the lawsuits on behalf of Monsanto.... In 1984 he joined King & Spaulding and remained there until 1991; during that time the law firm represented Monsanto while the company was seeking FDA approval of rBGH.... Taylor signed the FEDERAL REGISTER notice warning grocery stores not to label milk as free of rBGH, thus giving Monsanto a powerful boost in its fight to prevent consumers from knowing whether rBGH produced their milk" [17].

"Taylor did not simply fill a vacant position at the agency", says Jeffrey M. Smith in his book Seeds of Deception, "In 1991 the FDA created a new position for him: Deputy Commissioner for Policy. He instantly became the FDA official with the greatest influence on GM food regulation, overseeing the development of government policy. According to public interest attorney Steven Druker, who has studied the FDA's internal files, 'During Mr. Taylor's tenure as Deputy Commissioner, references to the unintended negative effects of bioengineering were progressively deleted from drafts of the policy statement (over the protests of agency scientists (1)), and a final statement was issued claiming (a) that [GM] foods are no riskier than others and (b) that the agency has no information to the contrary" [18] [19]. After his stint at the FDA Taylor went back to work as Monsanto's vice-president for public policy [20].

In disappointing news however, Taylor was again appointed to the FDA, this time for the Obama administration in July of 2009 as an "Advisor to FDA Commissioner" as a "food safety expert" [21]. His new duties include, "Assess current food program challenges and opportunities", "Identify capacity needs and regulatory priorities" and "Plan implementation of new food safety legislation".

Another example of the Government-industry revolving door is Margaret Miller, "In order for the FDA to determine if Monsanto's growth hormones were safe or not, Monsanto was required to submit a scientific report on that topic. Margaret Miller, one of Monsanto's researchers put the report together. Shortly before the report submission, Miller left Monsanto and was hired by the FDA [as deputy director of the Office of New Animal Drugs]. Her first job for the FDA was to determine whether or not to approve the report she wrote for Monsanto. In short, Monsanto approved its own report. Assisting Miller was another former Monsanto researcher, Susan Sechen" [22]. Here [23] you can read Robert Cohen's testimony before FDA on the subject of rBGH including the disclosure that, while at the FDA and in response to increasing sickness in cows on the stuff, Miller increased the amount of antibiotics that farmers can legally give cows by 100 times. See also [24]. "Remarkably the GAO determined in a 1994 investigation that these officials' former association with the Monsanto corporation did not pose a conflict of interest. But for those concerned about the health and environmental hazards of genetic engineering, the revolving door between the biotechnology industry and federal regulating agencies is a serious cause for concern" [25].

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Labeling_Issues,_Revolving_Doors,_rBGH,_Bribery_and_Monsanto

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

don't know what to say paulk Apr 2012 #1
No warrant and that investigator would have a bruised rear end from me kicking his ass off of my Lint Head Apr 2012 #2
I think in most instances that most farmers are just honest, trusting individuals... Earth_First Apr 2012 #4
I agree. Lint Head Apr 2012 #5
You'd just be defending your castle. nt sudopod Apr 2012 #18
Pathetic and infuriating! jillan Apr 2012 #3
I'm sorry to say this felix_numinous Apr 2012 #6
we must rethink our entire food supply... handmade34 Apr 2012 #7
This is the reason I won't eat soy. That and what they've done in India and Canada. freshwest Apr 2012 #8
Would you eat organic soy? roody Apr 2012 #14
Some of the people I know who grow organic still have to do expensive tests to prove their produce freshwest Apr 2012 #16
A product cannot be labelled USDA organic if it is known to have GMOs. roody Apr 2012 #23
If available. 90% of the soy consumed is GMO. Eat all you want. n/t freshwest Apr 2012 #24
Organic soy products are widely available where I live. roody Apr 2012 #28
unfortunately handmade34 Apr 2012 #21
True, and apparently some don't care, either. Or they'd boycott it. In my area, we avoid it. freshwest Apr 2012 #25
Percy Schmeiser Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #9
Monsanto is "protecting the farmers" by their patented seeds? NAO Apr 2012 #10
monsanto is EVIL. Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #11
What is being done to help Mo Parr and the Runyons? peacebird Apr 2012 #12
before he was appointed supreme court judge iemitsu Apr 2012 #13
Monsanto successfully sued Parr in Indiana court. justice1 Apr 2012 #15
Here's how Monsanto arranges for a FDA pass to poison the planet with their putrid GMO shit. JohnyCanuck Apr 2012 #17
All it takes is one fungus developing a taste for these crops... hunter Apr 2012 #19
Birds could even 'drop' seeds, for Lord's sake. Mimosa Apr 2012 #20
Year old story. How did it turn out? nt Ilsa Apr 2012 #22
"anonymous tip" Javaman Apr 2012 #26
And that is how we go back in time 500 years. laundry_queen Apr 2012 #29
Ding*ding*ding* we have a winner HeiressofBickworth Apr 2012 #30
Monsanto is so powerful... bvar22 Apr 2012 #27
I hope their lawyer also uses the term "contamination". kentauros Apr 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This story infuriates and...»Reply #17