Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(110,301 posts)
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 06:04 PM Aug 2014

Why they should NOT arrest Michael Brown's killer right away. [View all]

Last edited Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:42 PM - Edit history (1)

Once they indict the shooter or put him into custody, they have only 70-90 days to bring him to trial -- or they lose their opportunity. And that isn't a long time to develop a solid case.

It's better to take the time to fully develop the prosecution's case before they arrest him -- and win the case six months from now -- then to arrest him now and have to rush into a trial in 70 days without an absolutely rock-solid case.

Also, there could well be a Federal case here involving the police violation of civil rights laws; if the murder was based on race, as it strongly appears to be, then the Feds could prosecute. But it would take time to develop that case. For one thing, the police department had a filing system that means previous complaints against the officer aren't all in his personnel file -- they're scattered among the cases he worked on. And the Federal autopsy result aren't in yet. All of this is going to take TIME, and shouldn't be rushed to fit the 70 day deadline.

http://www.justanswer.com/criminal-law/1l0gf-time-limit-missouri-right-speedy-trial.html

You have a right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which requires that the trial be held within a certain time frame after a person has been charged with a crime. This right can be waived by asking for additional time for the preparation of your defense.

With limited exceptions, a defendant should be brought to trial in Missouri: Within 70 days of your first appearance on an Information or Indictment; If you are in custody, within 90 days following the beginning of custody.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bingo n/t sabbat hunter Aug 2014 #1
"70 days isn't a long time to develop a solid case. " 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #2
You're forgetting that there could well be a Federal case, led by Holder, because of the pnwmom Aug 2014 #8
I'm not Holding out or giving in to wishful thinking 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #18
This case has gotten far more publicity. I doubt the Feds will try to sweep this one under the rug. pnwmom Aug 2014 #19
The Kelly Thomas beating got worldwide attention. 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #22
Then why arrange for a grand jury on Wednesday? sadoldgirl Aug 2014 #3
A grand jury can take months to develop a case. And who told you there couldn't be federal charges? pnwmom Aug 2014 #9
He said murder charges..... BronxBoy Aug 2014 #12
TBH it's not really important that he's arrested right away LittleBlue Aug 2014 #4
If your info is correct, yes indeed. randys1 Aug 2014 #5
I rec'd the OP, but I agree with you also. Not everyone has the patience of a saint. n/t nomorenomore08 Aug 2014 #21
Where did you get that 70-day limit? IIRC, OJ Simpson was not tried for murder until VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #6
Each state has its own limit. I looked it up for Missouri, so I'll find it again. pnwmom Aug 2014 #10
also being out on bail as Simpson was makes a difference dsc Aug 2014 #11
Wait a second: OJ was never out on bail waiting for his trial on murder charges. He had a VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #13
sorry I thought he had bail dsc Aug 2014 #16
Yeah, I probably should just shut up on this topic I think, b/c I'm blowing hot VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #20
Ah, I stand corrected. I'm leaving my post up for thread integrity purposes but VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #14
I realized my OP would be stronger if I added the info you asked about, so I did. Thanks! n/t pnwmom Aug 2014 #17
True but we need to hope the prosecutor is fired up on the case treestar Aug 2014 #7
He will not be indicted, he will not be charged, he will not be tried alcibiades_mystery Aug 2014 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why they should NOT arres...