Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
16. But Rev. Jackson is there, and he won the S. Carolina primary in 1988...
Mon Aug 18, 2014, 07:40 PM
Aug 2014

.. so why should any Clinton get involved with this?




For those who have already forgotten...


http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/black-congressman-denounces-b-clintons-remarks/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0


^snip^


Black Leader in House Denounces Bill Clinton’s Remarks


The third-ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives and one of the country’s most influential African-American leaders sharply criticized former President Bill Clinton this afternoon for what he called Mr. Clinton’s “bizarre” conduct during the Democratic primary campaign.

Representative James E. Clyburn, an undeclared superdelegate from South Carolina who is the Democratic whip in the House, said that “black people are incensed over all of this,” referring to statements that Mr. Clinton had made in the course of the heated race between his wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Senator Barack Obama.

Mr. Clinton was widely criticized by black leaders after he equated the eventual victory of Mr. Obama in South Carolina in January to that of the Rev. Jesse Jackson in 1988 – a parallel that many took as an attempt to diminish Mr. Obama’s success in the campaign. In a radio interview in Philadelphia on Monday, Mr. Clinton defended his remarks and said the Obama campaign had “played the race card on me” by making an issue of those comments.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i can kind of see both sides here because anything she says will be reported in terms of a JI7 Aug 2014 #1
If Goldman Sachs got shot she'd be all over the TV elehhhhna Aug 2014 #8
Maybe because NO ONE KNOWS WHAT HAPPENED YET! nt Logical Aug 2014 #2
we know an unarmed person was shot multiple times and killed JI7 Aug 2014 #3
True, but not if he was rushing the cop or not. Nt Logical Aug 2014 #9
We certainly know what has happened since the shooting. DesMoinesDem Aug 2014 #5
Yup, maybe Brown was really Juggernaut and the cop had a magic bullet that turned him mortal? TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #10
Pretty worthless answer, thank goodness the FBI is investigating ant not you! nt Logical Aug 2014 #13
And people are criticizing Al for not staying for the night rally after he has mfcorey1 Aug 2014 #4
Recommended. The Third Way does not make for courage and conviction. mmonk Aug 2014 #6
I'm as skeptical of a Clinton candidacy as anyone gratuitous Aug 2014 #7
Yep, it's starting to put me off on her. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #11
She's damned if she does, damned if she doesn't... joeybee12 Aug 2014 #12
That's probably exactly how she saw it, too DFW Aug 2014 #14
She is a private citizen who has no obligation to speak out on anything. NaturalHigh Aug 2014 #15
True, but she has spoken out about ISIS, Syria, etc. ecstatic Aug 2014 #17
But Rev. Jackson is there, and he won the S. Carolina primary in 1988... Motown_Johnny Aug 2014 #16
Best she keep quiet because of her habit of flubbing messages up. JaydenD Aug 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Al Sharpton criticizes Hi...»Reply #16