Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I believe he will be charged with something when eyewitness accounts are corroborated by autopsy. Hoyt Aug 2014 #1
Murder or Manslaughter? el_bryanto Aug 2014 #2
Sounds like murder2 to me. HooptieWagon Aug 2014 #10
I think it was second degree murder. He pointed the gun and intentionally murdered him. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #13
How is that not First-Degree? Second-degree means with intent only to harm, not kill. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #39
Dont get legal advise from Yahoo Travis_0004 Aug 2014 #77
"Premeditation" doesn't take long, especially when one chooses to shoot multiple times. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #89
In Missouri, 'first degree murder' requires 'deliberation upon the matter'... PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #78
A legal analyst on msnbc (I don't remember who) rock Aug 2014 #82
State v. Miller, Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District (2007)... PoliticAverse Aug 2014 #84
"no matter how brief." Exactly. The cop DELIBERATED when he shot more than once. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #88
"Deliberation" can be defined as a second or two. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #87
Oh please. I wish DUers would stop with the "First Degree Murder" nonsense. Nye Bevan Aug 2014 #125
It's murder BklnDem75 Aug 2014 #133
OMG, look at the comments here: FiveGoodMen Aug 2014 #3
holy shit, some real winners there 0rganism Aug 2014 #5
It shows you what we're up against FiveGoodMen Aug 2014 #6
looks like about a 50/50 split to me 0rganism Aug 2014 #8
And the newspapers are free to post which ever responses they wish to promote their agenda. nm rhett o rick Aug 2014 #14
As long as it's an African American, jen63 Aug 2014 #32
ALAIAAA. (But FTR: Rand Paul deplores the militarization of police.) WinkyDink Aug 2014 #40
That is some sick shit people are saying. JEB Aug 2014 #7
i used to argue with people in the commetns section but... Takket Aug 2014 #12
The comments on the live feed last night AgingAmerican Aug 2014 #50
i think an indictment is likely 0rganism Aug 2014 #4
The change of venue request will be huge exboyfil Aug 2014 #29
I am afraid to say Rick, JEB Aug 2014 #9
God had better bless America if cops start thinking they can kill VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #83
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2014 #11
True, although I'm sure Darren Wilson's whereabouts are known. n/t JimDandy Aug 2014 #15
Of course, but why doesn't he get arrested? Why do they allow him to flee? rhett o rick Aug 2014 #19
Hyperbole doesn't help. Neither does Jesse Jackson saying this was a 'state execution'. randome Aug 2014 #16
You call it "hyperbole" but I call it outrage and it's about time for a little. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #17
Internally, the police are working out Wilson's exculpatory narrative, probably. A common practice, ancianita Aug 2014 #21
Yes I am aware. I am objecting to the fact that police-persons can go free pending investigations rhett o rick Aug 2014 #23
Well, what other legal remedy is there? He's out of sight to anyone. What more can be done? ancianita Aug 2014 #24
Lock him up unless he posts bail. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #31
That sweeps aside current treatment practices of those 'in the line of duty.' You want something ancianita Aug 2014 #34
Because all cops are gods. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #35
Not the prevailing interpretation of current practices, nor mine. ancianita Aug 2014 #36
A practicing New York lawyer friend of mine just told me... ancianita Aug 2014 #38
Most police agencies -most communities- are unprepared for something like this. randome Aug 2014 #43
Exactly why my lawyer friend says that he's likely on "modified assignment." ancianita Aug 2014 #47
I think you're missing the irony here: "the police will want to protect the officer and his family," rhett o rick Aug 2014 #59
Oh plez! If a citizen had done the exact same thing, they would be arrested immediately and rhett o rick Aug 2014 #57
Or they get out on bail. randome Aug 2014 #91
Yes, that's the difference. Police have one process, citizens have another because they're different ancianita Aug 2014 #99
"Someone working in security forces doesn't get civilian treatment under the law." rhett o rick Aug 2014 #56
I'm aware, too. But your objection is against decades of civilian acceptance of policy, too. ancianita Aug 2014 #80
Things have changed over the last 30 years. I've seen it first hand. I want them to change back. nm rhett o rick Aug 2014 #97
Really? Not in my lifetime. But good luck with your wanting. ancianita Aug 2014 #100
Really? Not in your lifetime? You either are young or naive, or both. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #105
What?? At no point were you talking militarization with me. You were talking about the 'irony' I ancianita Aug 2014 #107
AND I've actually recommended changes to prevent such police behavior in the future, IF you've read ancianita Aug 2014 #110
I apologize. I must have completely misunderstood you. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #112
Accepted. And for the record I enjoy reading most of your posts and understand how these events ancianita Aug 2014 #113
Dang, now you're just mocking me. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #114
Those are the rules agreed to with the Police Unions. Calista241 Aug 2014 #63
The apologists for the cop that killed that kid are sad people. Rex Aug 2014 #58
If a citizen is S U S P E C T E D of a crime they go to jail. Not him. Not the "all-mighty" police rhett o rick Aug 2014 #62
Well the apologists stayed zipped lipped when the reporters were arrested. Rex Aug 2014 #64
Authoritarians come in all forms. Some even call themselves Democrats. nm rhett o rick Aug 2014 #66
Yeah I think they believe they are, but their words sure do betray them. Rex Aug 2014 #67
Oh, good grief. ancianita Aug 2014 #111
Well you are free to ignore my post, but I will keep on pointing it out even Rex Aug 2014 #116
That's my point. You have not once pointed out any "apologist" language. Not once. ancianita Aug 2014 #117
No I don't have to prove anything to you, you just need to actually look Rex Aug 2014 #119
Hm. I looked. Disagreement isn't attempted censoring. Thought you could enlighten me. Nice talk. ancianita Aug 2014 #121
A few thoughts if I may. Savannahmann Aug 2014 #22
Thanks.Relevant context here when mulling practical street consequences of inequality under the law ancianita Aug 2014 #26
Well said... FarPoint Aug 2014 #33
I sure as hell am not excusing anything. randome Aug 2014 #45
"a slightly different process" bobduca Aug 2014 #54
Please point out what you consider "hyperbole." WinkyDink Aug 2014 #41
"State execution". The State had nothing to do with this. randome Aug 2014 #46
Wilson acted under color of state authority. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #48
So did the shooters at Kent State. The soldiers at My Lai. randome Aug 2014 #52
The OP doesn't say a thing about "state execution". Where did you get that out rhett o rick Aug 2014 #65
I mentioned Jesse Jackson's use of the phrase. randome Aug 2014 #92
Wilson's authority is derived from the State. Savannahmann Aug 2014 #73
Those are all FACTS, though. Like other facts, they need to stand or fall on their own. randome Aug 2014 #93
So far we have three eyewitness testimonies. Savannahmann Aug 2014 #94
We don't 'know' anything until testimony is given and evidence gathered. randome Aug 2014 #98
Are you saying we don't know who pulled the trigger? How many times the victim was shot? rhett o rick Aug 2014 #106
I agree. In addition, Wilson could be a danger to himself or his family... randome Aug 2014 #132
Legalized police murder has been the norm... 99Forever Aug 2014 #18
I've read elsewhere that the coroner's report won't be for a few weeks. Quite a delay. ancianita Aug 2014 #20
K/R marmar Aug 2014 #25
They already have, or DW would not feel that he can get away with this sh@#. WCLinolVir Aug 2014 #27
I don't think the officer "escaped" or... Mike Nelson Aug 2014 #28
I understand but if a citizen did what he did, they'd be arrested while the rhett o rick Aug 2014 #30
George Zimmerman wasn't immediately arrested davidn3600 Aug 2014 #53
I don't think Zimmy was a good example. If he'd been black and the victim was white, he'd rhett o rick Aug 2014 #70
Not always... the officer will have his/her version of the shooting... Mike Nelson Aug 2014 #69
Really? Savannahmann Aug 2014 #37
A lawyer friend of mine says that common department practice is to put him on modified assignment. ancianita Aug 2014 #44
Proof? Is there "proof" he escaped? I was only offering... Mike Nelson Aug 2014 #68
I think you are confusing "being watched carefully" with "being arrested." Will we get another WinkyDink Aug 2014 #42
My opinion is no attempt to take flight... Mike Nelson Aug 2014 #71
I think your opinion here is correct, but that doesn't make it a sound judgment by the dept. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #90
I am still waiting on dash cam footage NT Lee-Lee Aug 2014 #49
I think we've had police murder without consequences for a long time. merrily Aug 2014 #51
Um you're a little late for that johnlucas Aug 2014 #55
Years too late, been going on a long time...the difference is that his own group allowed Rex Aug 2014 #60
What gets ME down is that this site goes along with authoritarians FiveGoodMen Aug 2014 #74
I'm on the side that is right. Savannahmann Aug 2014 #75
True it can get depressing at times. Rex Aug 2014 #76
Most people are describing frustrated civilians, not prescribing authoritarianism. ancianita Aug 2014 #81
Unfortunately it has police murder has been normalized avebury Aug 2014 #61
War is normal when one is militarized isn't it. lonestarnot Aug 2014 #72
It's already normalized. The officers who killed LibDemAlways Aug 2014 #79
As lame as this probably sounds, Kelly Thomas' death was what first got me to tune in to VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #86
That's what sent me over the top also damnedifIknow Aug 2014 #109
I agree that the Kelly Thomas case was horrible, but this case is a perfect example of a police rhett o rick Aug 2014 #115
K&R, for justice... MrMickeysMom Aug 2014 #85
more of this crap TorchTheWitch Aug 2014 #95
If it appears that a crime has been committed, the police will put citizens directly in jail and rhett o rick Aug 2014 #96
probable cause TorchTheWitch Aug 2014 #118
I don't want mob rule. I want justice. Once again, if a citizen shot someone they'd be arrested rhett o rick Aug 2014 #120
So are you suggesting any time a cop fires a gun, he/she must be arrested? Kvectk Aug 2014 #126
Since we are guessing what the other is "suggesting", are you suggesting that rhett o rick Aug 2014 #130
No that is not what I'm saying. Kvectk Aug 2014 #134
I would love to see the "multiple reports". Do you count Sean Hannity as one? nm rhett o rick Aug 2014 #136
Agreed; Let's Find Out What Happened First sub.theory Aug 2014 #122
You are accusing some of "mob justice" when most just want justice. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #123
Then why accuse the officer of murder? sub.theory Aug 2014 #124
Why does he get to be free during the investigation? If I shot someone that was unarmed, I'd be rhett o rick Aug 2014 #127
o0o0o00o0....."prosecutions"....... Adam051188 Aug 2014 #101
I predict that Wilson will not be prosecuted. Most likely, he won't even be ladjf Aug 2014 #102
the american public has been mentally and emotionally neutered. Adam051188 Aug 2014 #104
I agree. nt ladjf Aug 2014 #108
now that this has gone to the justice department it will also involve violation of civil rights still_one Aug 2014 #103
I thought they would with yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #135
You mean if we don't deal with murdering cops like we dealt with war criminals & election-stealers? villager Aug 2014 #128
Cut to the chase ..... we're toast. rhett o rick Aug 2014 #129
well, the smaller, regional entities coming after climate shifts cause the Empire to break up... villager Aug 2014 #131
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Darren Wilson isn't ch...»Reply #136