Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Remember not to holler over Ferguson like our parental president says. . . 'don't shout' [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)24. K&R I feel sick,
because I see nothing in those words that shows acknowledgement of the real problem or intent to address it. IMO these words only heighten the sense of impotent rage.
Thank you for this post. It's eloquent and powerful, and it needed saying.
ACLU launches nationwide police militarization investigation
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/aclu-police-militarization-swat_n_2813334.html
It's almost certain that if the police agencies cooperate, the ACLU will find that the militarization trend has accelerated since Kraska's studies more than a decade ago. All of the policies, incentives and funding mechanisms that were driving the trend then are still in effect now. And most of them have grown in size and scope.
The George W. Bush administration actually began scaling down the Byrne and COPS programs in the early 2000s, part of a general strategy of leaving law enforcement to states and localities. But the Obama administration has since resurrected both programs. The Byrne program got a $2 billion surge in funding as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, by far the largest budget in the program's 25-year history. Obama also gave the COPS program $1.55 billion that same year, a 250 percent increase over its 2008 budget, and again the largest budget in the program's history. Vice President Joe Biden had championed both programs during his time in the Senate.
The Pentagon's 1033 program has also exploded under Obama. In the program's monthly newsletter (Motto: "From Warfighter to Crimefighter"
, its director announced in October 2011 that his office had given away a record $500 million in military gear in fiscal year 2011, which he noted, "passes the previous mark by several hundred million dollars." He added, "I believe we can exceed that in FY 12.
Then there are the Department of Homeland Security's anti-terrorism grants. The Center for Investigative Reporting found in a 2011 investigation that since 2001, DHS has given out more than $34 billion in grants to police departments across the country, many of which have been used to purchase military-grade guns, tanks, armor, and armored personnel carriers. The grants have gone to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D.; Canyon County, Idaho; and Tuscaloosa, Ala.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/aclu-police-militarization-swat_n_2813334.html
It's almost certain that if the police agencies cooperate, the ACLU will find that the militarization trend has accelerated since Kraska's studies more than a decade ago. All of the policies, incentives and funding mechanisms that were driving the trend then are still in effect now. And most of them have grown in size and scope.
The George W. Bush administration actually began scaling down the Byrne and COPS programs in the early 2000s, part of a general strategy of leaving law enforcement to states and localities. But the Obama administration has since resurrected both programs. The Byrne program got a $2 billion surge in funding as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, by far the largest budget in the program's 25-year history. Obama also gave the COPS program $1.55 billion that same year, a 250 percent increase over its 2008 budget, and again the largest budget in the program's history. Vice President Joe Biden had championed both programs during his time in the Senate.
The Pentagon's 1033 program has also exploded under Obama. In the program's monthly newsletter (Motto: "From Warfighter to Crimefighter"
Then there are the Department of Homeland Security's anti-terrorism grants. The Center for Investigative Reporting found in a 2011 investigation that since 2001, DHS has given out more than $34 billion in grants to police departments across the country, many of which have been used to purchase military-grade guns, tanks, armor, and armored personnel carriers. The grants have gone to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D.; Canyon County, Idaho; and Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Link to the final ACLU report on militarization of police in America
https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/war-comes-home-excessive-militarization-american-police-report
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Remember not to holler over Ferguson like our parental president says. . . 'don't shout' [View all]
bigtree
Aug 2014
OP
What do you think about the proposal of a 5 day moratorium on night time protests?
pinto
Aug 2014
#3
As long as it is voluntary and it came from the black community it is interesting.
cui bono
Aug 2014
#69
Why? Why ask the protesters to be quiet? Is there some notion somewhere that this is just
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#43
I think it is high time that Obama used his bully pulpit to address the black elephant in the room
tavalon
Aug 2014
#25
There is NO bully pulpit. There hasn't been since Reagan relaxed ownership laws
BlueCaliDem
Aug 2014
#111
He needs to take a stand and stop with the always present 'both sides did it'. This tactic happens
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#47
Now that would have been interesting. This would have been the perfect time to do it too. n/t
cui bono
Aug 2014
#73
He is not going to encourage a riot. Those are expected words coming from a President.
JaydenD
Aug 2014
#42
That's true. You will NEVER please everyone. Which is why you need to decide which side
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#77
''he obviously doesn't understand anything about what folks are angry about. '' w.t.f.
JaydenD
Aug 2014
#9
I believe the sign the college student seen in another thread stated explains the rage and
AuntPatsy
Aug 2014
#37
+1 Police militarization, surveillance, assaults on journalism, persecution of whistleblowers...
woo me with science
Aug 2014
#41
There are threads explaining very well why Obama has to be circumspect in what he says.
KittyWampus
Aug 2014
#70
I've read his ops lately I don't see hate, I read anger and frustration, considering everything both
AuntPatsy
Aug 2014
#30
There is actually a lot of hate… and ignorance. The only way not to see it is to share it.
KittyWampus
Aug 2014
#72
You nailed it. And some folks have made being disingenous assholes their speciality
Number23
Aug 2014
#55
Which office? We're talking about POTUS here. And he is NOT a liberal Democrat.
cui bono
Aug 2014
#76
I honestly don't see blaming anyone here? You know my son who is 28 told me the other night
AuntPatsy
Aug 2014
#63
Horrific, and for the record why aren't all the horrors done by early Americans part of our teaching
AuntPatsy
Aug 2014
#67
I agree with him. You can "holler" all you want, but people won't listen to you,
wisteria
Aug 2014
#60
It is truly astounding all the rights that people are willing to give up in order to defend Obama.
cui bono
Aug 2014
#79
I find it truly astounding that people are so tone deaf and unaware of the facts....
sheshe2
Aug 2014
#106
WHY Obama cannot make any remarks considered prejudical or visit: WILSON WILL WALK!
freshwest
Aug 2014
#108
Thanks, your thanks made me cry a little! Big day tomorrow, though! Night, sweets.
freshwest
Aug 2014
#110