Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mimosa

(9,131 posts)
25. Cancer rates will go up.
Tue Apr 10, 2012, 10:04 AM
Apr 2012

The statistics will be masked of course. Right off the top of my head I can figure out one cover story: 'aging population'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seriously? We're screwn. That radiation is EVERYWHERE -- why on earth do they pretend gateley Apr 2012 #1
Seriously, you need to get an education. Coal fired plants emit more "fallout"... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #6
sure are wasting a lot of money on all those containment facilities than got root Apr 2012 #9
GLOBAL and LOCAL are two very different things. TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #15
Thanks for your very sane comment. truedelphi Apr 2012 #36
Gosh! I had NO IDEA cole fired plants emit fallout! Well since they're WORSE, lets gateley Apr 2012 #11
Actually, I'm comforted by you lot, despite fifty years of trying, failing... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #16
The earth is flat Generic Other Apr 2012 #24
6000 years old nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #28
NO! Radiation can hurt you. It can hurt you a lot IF you get a big enough dose. TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #41
My relatives live within 100 miles of Fukushima Generic Other Apr 2012 #50
Belief and worry are almost certainly doing your relatives more damage... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #52
You willing to eat their crops? For how long? Generic Other Apr 2012 #53
Perfectly willing. I'm sure you're aware of the health effects of stress. TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #54
What goes around comes around Generic Other Apr 2012 #56
Well in all sincerity, I wish you luck and I wish I COULD be swayed. gateley Apr 2012 #26
Really? When, with a different subject, (and poorer spelling) your post might... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #42
It was undetectable later because, as you note, it was radioactive iodine they were checking for. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #46
Since AFAIK, nothing concentrates caesium in it's tissues, like kelp... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #51
Hope you're right. nt Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #55
Should I pretend to be a smidgen surprised? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #2
Only if you forgot about all the conversations we had Rex Apr 2012 #40
"If I should remark that in the Pacific depths. . . Journeyman Apr 2012 #3
f-----! FirstLight Apr 2012 #4
"it was undetectable a month later. Iodine 131 "has an eight-day half-life..." uppityperson Apr 2012 #5
Iodine 131 has a half life of eight days nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #17
I notice you conveniently omitted the following paragraph... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #7
Maybe it was omitted because only 4 paragraphs are allowed to be excerpted. neverforget Apr 2012 #8
That's more likely to be excuse than reason. Four is a guideline... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #12
sure, nothing to worry about, coal fall out is even worse got root Apr 2012 #10
Umm, I always post the first four graphs of any article, with a link..... marmar Apr 2012 #14
Oh he will... nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #18
Even if those four paragraphs beg a different conclusion, than... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #20
"It seems ALL you every do in an OP is post the first four paras, then sit back and wait ..." marmar Apr 2012 #21
I in fact do click links. I also know (as I'm sure you do) that a hell of a lot... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #30
Like me, he always posts the first four paras nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #19
Cancer rates will go up. Mimosa Apr 2012 #25
Well it's not cover nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #27
Around Chernobyl yes, but in much lower numbers than doomsdayers... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #33
Yup, this is why Chernobyl is still an exclusion zone nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #44
Almost certainly. By an amount so small as to be essentially indistinguishable... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #34
Doh abelenkpe Apr 2012 #13
Fergedaboutit. Minus time from the smog certainly helped more... TheMadMonk Apr 2012 #35
i look forward to it being in the toothpaste of our economic overlords. NuttyFluffers Apr 2012 #22
Get your bananas malaise Apr 2012 #23
Not surprising. There was a release from MineralMan Apr 2012 #29
the problem is much bigger than the iodine -radiation truedelphi Apr 2012 #37
Sounds like a pretty boring diet, really. MineralMan Apr 2012 #38
that beautiful coastline in California is going lovuian Apr 2012 #31
No, it's not. zappaman Apr 2012 #32
Not until the next major earthquake, it's not. MineralMan Apr 2012 #39
If San Onofre goes... nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #45
Apparently this was from rain during that time suffragette Apr 2012 #43
Hold it, some of us said 8-10 days for jet stream to bring it over nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #47
Yes, I remember those days, too, and in the same way suffragette Apr 2012 #48
You remember correctly nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fukushima radiation found...»Reply #25