Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

JohnnyRingo

(20,882 posts)

14. Why would she have delivery at 4 months?

Reply to 2ndAmForComputers (Original post)

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 12:42 PM

Apr 2012

It's not like the fetus said "OK, I'm done developing, let's get this done!".

Something went terribly wrong with the pregnancy to force a premature delivery at that time, and would have compounded the chances of survival. It's called a miscarriage.

I say it's a "friend of a friend" right wing myth. I imagine this person also knows someone who has a friend that was kidnapped at the mall by someone who slashed her achilles tendon from under a parked car.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

An anti-choicer just told me he knows somebody who had a baby at 4 months of gestation [View all] 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 OP

That sounds pretty extraordinary Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2012 #1

The earliest a baby has been born and survived was at 21 weeks and 6 days. So maybe your friend Brickbat Apr 2012 #2

And even then, it's 5.1 months. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #7

21 weeks 6 days is over 5 mos. Bluerthanblue Apr 2012 #8

Did her husband come back from overseas deployment 6 months before she got pregnant? tjwash Apr 2012 #3

Bingo crazylikafox Apr 2012 #34

You know it! Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #35

Sounds like anti-choicer, forced birther bullshit. Hepburn Apr 2012 #4

I would think it's BS too... TroglodyteScholar Apr 2012 #5

sombody is lying Bluerthanblue Apr 2012 #6

I think someone is lying AND someone is misinformed. Mariana Apr 2012 #15

It's possible. What's the gestation period for a cat? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #9

63 days on avg mrs_p Apr 2012 #25

And I know a Republican madamesilverspurs Apr 2012 #10

People enjoy lying cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #11

The lungs are non-functional at 4 months. RC Apr 2012 #12

HA! Get his reply: 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #13

so he's in Germany? Bluerthanblue Apr 2012 #17

Nowhere NEAR it! 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #30

Why would she have delivery at 4 months? JohnnyRingo Apr 2012 #14

Lungs don't develop until the 7th month BlueToTheBone Apr 2012 #16

They do, though Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #27

This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Apr 2012 #18

Yah, it's bullshit. Ask that person for the name of the woman who had a MineralMan Apr 2012 #19

They are lying.... ingac70 Apr 2012 #20

If true, it would have made the news broadcasts. Probably on a national level. arbusto_baboso Apr 2012 #21

She is either, mistaken, misled, or a liar Marrah_G Apr 2012 #22

There are 20-21 week survivals Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #23

Yes. And no. lapislzi Apr 2012 #24

trying to debate someone of subnormal intelligence is a waste of time pitohui Apr 2012 #26

What was the medical bill in order to do this? benld74 Apr 2012 #28

Repubs in AZ are trying to push that pregnancy dates begin with last menstrual period ... IggleDoer Apr 2012 #29

Unless science has found a way to put the baby in a jar until it matures to a Cleita Apr 2012 #31

Sometimes it's better to Google ... GeorgeGist Apr 2012 #32

It's bullshit. That's 5.1 months, it's a single case and it happened in Germany. 2ndAmForComputers Apr 2012 #36

They are wrong. No baby has ever survived being born at 4 months (18 weeks) LeftishBrit Apr 2012 #33